Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – March 5, 2014 4 <br /> <br />Commissioner Holewa discussed the proposed transparency coverage on the building. He was <br />concerned that the Lexington Avenue façade would have the appearance of being the back of the <br />building. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler explained this issue was discussed with the applicant. He <br />understood the design of the east façade was a concern, but in order to accommodate restaurant <br />tenants in the building, non-transparent windows were being requested in certain areas on three <br />sides of the building. He indicated the proposed solution was preferred versus the use of <br />spandrel glass. He believed that the frosted windows would allow light from the interior to pass <br />through the windows giving an open appearance. Staff supports the solution proposed by the <br />applicant. <br /> <br />Commissioner Holewa indicated that the Planning Commission did not want the east façade to <br />appear to be the rear of the building. He feared that the proposed windows would have this effect. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Thompson invited the applicant to speak. <br /> <br />Nicholas Roberts, Roberts Management Group, thanked staff for the thorough presentation. He <br />stated his goal was to create a high end retail center that would be the showcase of the entire <br />development. He stated that the building was designed to have four sided architecture given its <br />visibility along Lexington Avenue and that the building was fully wrapped in brick. However, <br />having transparent glass on three sides of the tenant spaces was not conducive to tenants with <br />kitchens. For that reason, he was requesting an amendment to the PUD to address this concern. <br />Mr. Roberts requested that the Planning Commission allow for the frosted glass as proposed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Holewa recommended that the tenant space be designed to have the kitchens and <br />restrooms located on the interior wall. This would eliminate the need for frosted glass. He <br />believed that the tenants were just taking the easiest route. <br /> <br />Mr. Roberts stated this would not be an option for Starbucks given the location of their drive- <br />thru on the north side of the building. This may be an option for Noodles & Company. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bartel agreed that the tenants were taking the easy route in terms of the interior <br />layout. He recommended the developer view the Noodles/Caribou/Chipotle development in <br />Eden Prairie. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hames stated that the rear of the building did face Lexington Avenue and this <br />façade had arched windows, brick, and awnings, as per the request of the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Thompson opened the public hearing at 7:05 p.m. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Thompson invited anyone for or against the application to come forward and make <br />comment. <br /> <br />There being no comment, Vice Chair Thompson closed the public hearing at 7:06 p.m. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Thompson opened the floor to Commissioner comments. <br />