Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – AUGUST 11, 2014 5 <br /> <br />Community Development Director Hutmacher explained that during the regulations and <br />policies component of the master planning process, the City Council will establish the types of <br />residential uses allowed in each district, setbacks for residential uses, maximum height, etc. All of <br />these characteristics affect overall density in residential neighborhoods. She stated that the City <br />Council may choose to establish a maximum number of residential units at this time. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden commented that residents are concerned with the density on TCAAP. <br />In addition, there are concerns regarding how traffic flow would change throughout the City. She <br />has heard from many residents that open space is desired and for this reason, she supported 1,500 <br />resident units on TCAAP. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes was concerned with how the Creek and Hill neighborhoods would have <br />less density, while the Town would be more densely populated. She discussed the current density <br />within neighborhoods in Arden Hills and compared it to the proposed density within the Town <br />neighborhood. She suggested that the Council further consider the residential density as well as <br />how it will be disbursed within the neighborhoods on TCAAP. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Hutmacher anticipated that the Council would be reviewing <br />the table of uses in the next week, which would break down the appropriate location for homes, <br />townhomes, apartments and senior housing within TCAAP. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden stated that she never believed that the Creek and Hill neighborhoods <br />would only be single-family homes. She anticipated that there would be a mix of townhouses as <br />well as million dollar homes. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant believed that there would have to be transitional housing between the <br />townhomes/apartments and larger single-family homes. He supported the 1,500 unit density for <br />TCAAP and feared that anything over and above this number would be too great for the space <br />available. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung was in favor of 1,700 units on TCAAP and wanted to see pockets of <br />density within the neighborhoods as this would allow for transitional housing. It was his opinion <br />that this would create more stable neighborhoods in the long run. He thought that the density <br />would end up somewhere between 1,500 and 1,700 units. He believed that the most important <br />thing for TCAAP would be for the end product to create a high quality development that would be <br />sustained long term. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant also wanted to see the 130 acres of residential land within TCAAP to be developed <br />with high-quality housing. He wanted to see people move into the area and stay. He supported a <br />density of 1,500 units within TCAAP. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden commented that the management of apartment units would be crucial to <br />the success of these units. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes was not comfortable arriving at a density number until she was able to <br />review more financial data, along with SAC and WAC fee analysis. <br />