Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – September 3, 2014 3 <br /> <br />15. The current placement of the single family dwelling leaves limited options for the <br />construction of an accessory structure that meets all setback regulations and minimizes <br />tree loss and final grading. <br />16. The proposed accessory structure would be visible from neighboring properties; however, <br />the proposed location, design and the use of quality materials for the detached structure <br />that are compatible in appearance to the single family dwelling should minimize the <br />impacts on surrounding property owners. <br />17. The proposed accessory structure is unlikely to have negative impacts to the property or <br />to the neighborhood as a whole. <br />City Planner Streff stated that the property is fairly unique when compared to other properties <br />in Arden Hills because of its topography, number of significant trees and the configuration of the <br />single family dwelling on the lot. Because of the lot’s topography, natural drainage pattern, <br />significant trees and the configuration of principal structure at the rear of the lot, options for the <br />movement of the accessory structure to an area that meets all zoning regulations is very limited in <br />order to minimize tree loss and grading on the property. Due to the scope of the project and the <br />proposed addition of an accessory structure, the character of the neighborhood or the City is not <br />expected to be negatively affected. <br /> <br />City Planner Streff explained that the findings of fact for the Site Plan Review support a <br />recommendation for approval. However, if the Planning Commission chooses to make a <br />recommendation for denial, the Findings of Fact would need to be amended to reflect the reasons <br />for the denial. If the Planning Commission recommends approval of the Site Plan Review, staff <br />recommends the following eight (8) conditions: <br /> <br />1. That the project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended <br />by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by <br />the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City <br />Council. <br />2. That the proposed accessory structure shall be permitted to be located in the front yard <br />(between the dwelling and the street) at a distance of fifty-eight (58) feet from the front <br />property line. <br />3. That the proposed accessory structure shall not exceed a footprint of 720 square feet. <br />4. That the exterior façade and roofing materials of the proposed detached accessory garage <br />shall match or be compatible in appearance and material used with the principal structure. <br />5. That the proposed driveway/parking area shall be improved with hard surface. No <br />additional driveway/parking areas shall be constructed with gravel, “class 5” or other <br />similar materials. <br />6. That no living quarters shall be constructed within the proposed accessory structure. <br />7. That the structure shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. That a building <br />permit for the construction of the new accessory structure and a zoning permit for the <br />construction of the driveway shall be required. <br />8. That the applicant shall obtain a Grading and Erosion Control Permit from the City before <br />the building permit is issued. <br /> <br />City Planner Streff reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this matter: <br /> <br />1. Recommend Approval with Conditions <br />2. Recommend Approval as Submitted.