Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – September 3, 2014 8 <br /> <br />possible extension of Fairview Avenue further south. Given how this area has developed since <br />then, it is unlikely that a designated street would be constructed where the alley is currently <br />located. If there were a greater chance of a street expansion project in the future abutting 1830 <br />Noble Road, staff would be less supportive of the variance request. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler reported that the neighborhood along Noble and Grant Roads was <br />subdivided in the 1950s and most parcels in the area have a width of approximately 75 feet. <br />Under the current zoning regulations for the R-2 District, these lots would be considered non- <br />conforming as the minimum lot width in this district is 85 feet. Additionally, the existing <br />requirement that corner lots maintain front yard setbacks along all street frontages had not been <br />adopted at the time the area was first developed. This can be seen in the large number of <br />dwellings on corner lots in the southwest part of the City which conform to the front yard setback <br />along only one street frontage. For a 75-foot wide corner lot to be in compliance with the Zoning <br />Code, the maximum width of a dwelling that could be constructed would be 30 feet to meet the <br />secondary front yard setback of 40 feet and the side yard setback of 5 feet. Staff believes that in <br />this area of the City, the corner lot setback requirements for non-conforming parcels due to lot <br />width can be overly restrictive and limit the type of dwellings that can be constructed. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler explained that the findings of fact for this variance request support a <br />recommendation for approval. However, if the Planning Commission chooses to make a <br />recommendation for denial, the Findings of Fact would need to be amended to reflect the reasons <br />for the denial. If the Planning Commission recommends approval of this variance, staff <br />recommends the following four conditions: <br /> <br />1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the <br />conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City <br />Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City <br />Council. <br />2. The property owner shall obtain a Grading and Erosion Control Permit from the City <br />before the building permit is issued. <br />3. A building permit and a demolition permit for the construction of the new dwelling and a <br />zoning permit for the construction of the driveway shall be required. <br />4. The structure shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this <br />matter: <br /> <br />1. Recommend Approval with Conditions <br />2. Recommend Approval as Submitted. <br />3. Recommend Denial <br />4. Table <br /> <br />Chair Larson opened the floor to Commissioner comments. <br /> <br />Commissioner Holewa requested further information on the alleyway. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler provided further detail on how the City viewed the alleyway. <br />