My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-13-14-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
10-13-14-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2014 2:16:54 PM
Creation date
10/9/2014 10:12:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—OCTOBER 13, 2014 4 <br /> Mayor Grant suggested that the language regarding special projects be tightened up. He <br /> reiterated that the JDA was made up of three residents of Arden Hills which could impact the 4/5 <br /> vote. <br /> Councilmember Holmes wanted all setback variances reviewed by the City Council in certain <br /> zoning areas. <br /> Councilmember Holden discussed the language regarding special projects and suggested that <br /> staff review the amount of leeway that would be allowed by the JDA. In addition, she was in <br /> favor of limiting the number of tilt-up buildings. She hoped to make TCAAP something special <br /> and not just a typical development. <br /> Councilmember McClung believed that the Council's greatest impact on TCAAP would be in <br /> regard to how the water feature and water runoff are managed. He would have to be comfortable <br /> with the Code in order to support it. He suggested that the 10-acre minimum for a special project <br /> plan be decreased. He reported that he couldn't support the current variability within Section 3.3 <br /> at this point. <br /> Mayor Grant summarized that the Council supported the 4/5's vote for special projects, but that <br /> the special project language needed further review. He believed that the Council wanted to further <br /> discuss the criteria that would trigger the requirement for further review. He stated that the <br /> Council supported the governance structure but needed to work on what would be allowed within <br /> the structure. <br /> Councilmember McClung asked how long the JDA approval process would stay in effect. <br /> Mr. Norton reported that the City and the County could agree to change the JPA at any time. He <br /> explained that when there is no more land for the County to sell, there would no longer be a <br /> functional use for the JDA; and at that time, the City and County could discuss making the <br /> authority"inactive". <br /> Mayor Grant asked the Council how they wanted to proceed with the Park Dedication Ordinance <br /> discussion. It was the consensus of the Council to review the memo from the City Attorney and to <br /> discuss this issue at a future work session. City Attorney Jamnik stated that state law provides the <br /> Council with the authority to require the dedication of land through the subdivision process and he <br /> advised the Council that the City Ordinance should be reviewed and updated. <br /> Mayor Grant adjourned the work session at 6:53 p.m. to a regular City Council meeting. <br /> Mayor Grant reconvened the work session at 8:13 p.m. <br /> C. 2015 Proposed Budget and Tax Levy <br /> Director of Finance and Administrative Services Iverson stated that in preparation for adoption <br /> of the final tax levy in December, the following information was included in the staff memo found <br /> in the agenda packet: recap of residential property values (the Council has had this information in <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.