My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-10-14-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
11-10-14-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2016 3:51:05 PM
Creation date
11/12/2014 8:30:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
223
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – SEPTEMBER 22, 2014 5 <br /> <br />Mr. Laberee recommended that the lit park be shifted closer to the spine road and businesses. He <br />believed that a lit ball field would not fit well into the proposed neighborhood and could hamper <br />values and desirability. He supported the smaller neighborhood park but suggested it be more <br />centrally located. <br /> <br />Ms. Kvilvang questioned what size pocket parks developers placed in neighborhoods. <br /> <br />Mr. Laberee stated that his preference is for the City to complete the park. He stated that if an <br />HOA were to complete the park, this would raise dues and could make the neighborhood less <br />desirable. He suggested that the two proposed parks be combined into one. <br /> <br />Mr. Pratt suggested that a larger park be centrally located in the Hill neighborhood. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Hutmacher explained that the proposed park location was <br />due to the slope and topography of the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant asked if there was an advantage to place more homes per acre in a neighborhood <br />for a developer. <br /> <br />Mr. Pratt stated that 10 units to the acre were for $200,000 homes, while a lower density would <br />increase the price of the home. He believed that the City would need a variety of housing and <br />wide range of pricing on TCAAP. <br /> <br />Mr. Laberee commented that people were paying more for single family homes today in most <br />communities than for townhomes due to land prices and the cost of construction. He did not <br />believe it would be in the City’s best interest to put a large number of units on each acre. <br /> <br />Ms. Kvilvang stated that based on the standards set by the City, builders would offer a variety of <br />lot sizes and types of housing. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden indicated that originally it was thought that 1,700 units of housing <br />would have to be placed on TCAAP. However, maybe 1,000 units would bring in the same value <br />when selling the land. <br /> <br />Ms. Kvilvang indicated that the builders would have to go in and do their calculations based on <br />the land price before a determination could be made. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant anticipated that density numbers would be driven by the Town neighborhood. <br /> <br />Mr. Pratt questioned what was driving the 1,700 units. <br /> <br />Ms. Kvilvang reported that the City and County have been discussing this number along with the <br />overall expense to bring basic services to the property, while also cleaning the property. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes explained that the Council has not reached consensus or agreed to 1,700 <br />units. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.