My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-10-14-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
11-10-14-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2016 3:51:05 PM
Creation date
11/12/2014 8:30:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
223
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – SEPTEMBER 22, 2014 8 <br /> <br />Council the proposed 2015 budget and tax levy information for discussion. This was handed out <br />to all Councilmembers at the September 15, 2014, work session. <br /> <br />An additional handout was distributed at the meeting that detailed staff salaries. The Council <br />indicated that this salary data did not need to be included in the budget document. <br /> <br />Director of Finance and Administrative Services Iverson explained that a final levy is <br />established and certified in December. She indicated that once a preliminary levy is established, <br />the amount can be reduced, but it cannot be increased. In order to proceed with preliminary <br />budget preparation, it would be helpful to have additional Council input. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung reported that the highest levy increase he could support in December <br />would be 2%. He encouraged the Council to find reductions in the budget. <br /> <br />City Administrator Klaers commented that the current budget proposed a 4.5% levy increase <br />and $35,000 of reserves being used. He stated that the levy increase equaled $148,000 and <br />covered the public safety increase, the EDA transfer and the increase to street maintenance <br />materials. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes did not support an expense of $30,000 to the EDA budget. She saw no <br />justification for this expense. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant believed that at some point the EDA would need funds to complete projects. The <br />Council had to determine how these economic development projects would be funded. <br /> <br />Director of Finance and Administrative Services Iverson stated that the transfer of these funds <br />assist in covering staff time spent on economic development activities. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes questioned why the City was putting money into employees’ HSA <br />accounts. <br /> <br />Director of Finance and Administrative Services Iverson indicated that using HSA accounts <br />was a Council policy decision made in 2007, becoming effective in 2008. Previously, the <br />difference between single and family coverage was put into Employee’s ICMA-RC 457 plan <br />accounts. At that time, it was determined that a higher deductible plan would lower costs for the <br />City. In 2009, as an incentive for making the transition to such an insurance plan, the difference <br />between the premium and the City’s contribution was put into their HSA accounts. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant stated that the Council could also decide to change this policy. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden and Councilmember Holmes were in favor of changing this funding <br />policy. <br /> <br />Further discussion ensued regarding the amount spent on individual and family insurance policies. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden wanted to see the exact amounts that were being paid monthly for <br />individual and family coverage.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.