Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – SEPTEMBER 29, 2014 8 <br /> <br />5. The proposed accessory structure is setback fifty-eight (58) feet from the front property <br />line and twenty-eight (28) feet from the southern side yard. <br />6. The structure does not encroach into a front, side or rear yard setback. <br />7. The proposed structure and landscaping coverages are within the zoning district <br />requirements. The new structure will increase the lot coverage from 5.36% to 6.62% and <br />decreases the landscaping coverage from 94.64% to 93.38%. <br />8. The proposed accessory structure would not exceed fifteen (15) feet in height. <br />9. Detached accessory structures up to seven hundred and twenty-eight (728) square feet are <br />permitted structures within the R-1 Zoning District. <br />10. All structures on the lot are outside of the 100-year flood plain, wetlands, and easements. <br />11. The proposal is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as the <br />Ordinance generally allows flexibility for unique parcels and situations when impacts to <br />surrounding properties are minimized. <br />12. The proposal is consistent with the Arden Hills Comprehensive Plan as it allows the <br />reasonable use of residential property. <br />13. Detached accessory structures are permitted and a reasonable use within the R-1 Single <br />Family Residential Zoning District. <br />14. The property is rather unique due to the placement of the existing single family dwelling in <br />the rear of the lot approximately two-hundred (200) feet from the front property line. <br />15. The current placement of the single family dwelling leaves limited options for the <br />construction of an accessory structure that meets all setback regulations and minimizes <br />tree loss and final grading. <br />16. The proposed accessory structure would be visible from neighboring properties; however, <br />the proposed location, design and the use of quality materials for the detached structure <br />that are compatible in appearance to the single family dwelling should minimize the <br />impacts on surrounding property owners. <br />17. The proposed accessory structure is unlikely to have negative impacts to the property or to <br />the neighborhood as a whole. <br /> <br />City Planner Streff stated that the property is fairly unique when compared to other properties in <br />Arden Hills. Because of the lot’s topography, natural drainage pattern, significant trees, and the <br />configuration of the principal structure at the rear of the lot, options for the movement of the <br />accessory structure to an area that meets all zoning regulations are very limited. Due to the scope <br />of the project and the proposed addition of an accessory structure, the character of the <br />neighborhood or the City is not expected to be negatively affected. <br /> <br />City Planner Streff explained that the property owner is proposing to construct the new driveway <br />and parking area in front of the garage with a gravel or rock material. Knowing that the majority <br />of driveway and parking areas on the lot are not currently improved with a hard surface, it was <br />determined that any new areas should be improved with a hard surface as indicated in condition <br />number 5. The Code states in Section 1325.06 that off-street parking areas and drives shall be <br />improved with a hard surface and prohibits parking of vehicles on any area of the property except <br />on a designed driveway or parking area. <br /> <br />City Planner Streff reported the findings of fact for the site plan review support a <br />recommendation for approval. However, if the City Council chooses to make a recommendation <br />for denial, the findings of fact would need to be amended to reflect the reasons for the denial.