My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-20-14-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
10-20-14-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/25/2014 12:23:37 PM
Creation date
11/25/2014 12:23:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—OCTOBER 20, 2014 2 <br /> Further discussion ensued regarding the proposed intersection and trail system. <br /> Mayor Grant questioned if the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) supported the proposed <br /> intersection. <br /> Ms. Engum indicated that the RCWD has been supportive of the proposed plans for the County <br /> Road H intersection. <br /> Councilmember McClung asked if the City and County had enough funding to complete the <br /> intersection in one phase. <br /> Ms. Engum explained that the County was proposing to complete the project in one phase in <br /> 2016. She stated that she would be back in December to further discuss the plans for this <br /> intersection with the Council. She noted that the County would be holding a TCAAP open house <br /> on Tuesday, December 9, 2014, from 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. in the Marsden Room. <br /> Councilmember Holden inquired how the cost sharing for this intersection would work. <br /> Ms. Engum reported that the cost sharing for County Road H would be similar to the County <br /> Road 96 intersection. <br /> Heather Worthington, Ramsey County, advised that the County would be requesting additional <br /> funding from the legislature in 2015. An additional $6.5 million would be requested. <br /> 2. Spine Road Discussion <br /> City Administrator Klaers stated that at the September 8th work session, Kent Carlson from <br /> Anderson Companies, indicated that a depth of 664 feet would be needed for double loading <br /> buildings in the flex zone. If this was what the City desired, then part of the Spine Road would <br /> need to be moved to the east. At that time, most of the Council felt that this idea was worth <br /> investigating. <br /> City Administrator Klaers explained that at the September 29th work session, Jon Horn from <br /> Kimley Horn, gave a verbal update on their analysis and the pros and cons for relocation of the <br /> Spine Road. Based on a number of site constraints and impacts to the wetlands on the site and <br /> future land uses, it was the recommendation of the City staff, the County staff, and the consultants <br /> to not move the Spine Road. At that work session, the Council asked if a smaller section of the <br /> Spine Road could be moved to the east to accommodate a limited amount of double loading in the <br /> flex zone. <br /> Heather Worthington, Ramsey County, reported that City and County representatives and the <br /> consulting team met with the Port Authority to discuss commercial lot depth requirements. She <br /> indicated that the County does not see a need to double load the lots, as single loaded lots would <br /> be marketable. She explained that the County was in favor of keeping the Spine Road alignment <br /> as proposed. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked how the County came to this decision. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.