Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—JANUARY 12, 2015 4 <br /> B. Public Hearing — 2015 Pavement Management Program — Venus/Crystal <br /> Neighborhood <br /> Assistant City Engineer Anderson stated that on December 8, 2014, the City Council received a <br /> feasibility report for the 2015 Pavement Management Plan for the Venus/Crystal Neighborhood <br /> Improvement Project and ordered a public hearing for January 12, 2015. He presented the Council <br /> with information regarding construction standards and utility improvements planned for the <br /> Venus/Crystal street improvement project. He discussed a community survey that was taken <br /> regarding the project and noted that 54% (34) of the residents were in favor of street <br /> reconstruction while 41% (26) supported a reclamation project. <br /> Assistant City Engineer Anderson reviewed the project costs for both a reconstruction project <br /> and a reclamation project. He provided further comment on the City's assessment policy noting <br /> that assessments were done on a per unit basis. He explained that corner lots would be assessed <br /> as a single unit. He reported that the reconstruction option would have an assessment rate of <br /> $11,450 per unit and the reclamation option would have an assessment rate of$7,850 per unit. He <br /> noted that four properties that are proposed to be assessed for this improvement project were also <br /> assessed for the 1998 Fairview improvement project. <br /> Assistant City Engineer Anderson explained that following Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, <br /> notice of the public hearing must be posted twice prior to the meeting; this was done in the <br /> Bulletin on December 31, 2014, and January 7, 2015. A notice was also sent to each property <br /> proposed to be assessed as a part of this project. Staff reviewed the project timeline and <br /> explained that once the public hearing is closed, the next step in the process is for the City <br /> Council to decide on a reconstruction/reclamation project and then order the improvements and <br /> preparation of plans and specifications. <br /> Mayor Grant thanked Mr. Anderson for his presentation and asked if the Council had any <br /> questions. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked if the reclamation process would allow for the removal of the <br /> clay soils under the street. <br /> Assistant City Engineer Anderson explained that this process would not allow for the proper <br /> removal of the poor soils and noted that the new road could heave due to the clay-type soils under <br /> the roadway. <br /> Councilmember Woodburn questioned if the City had a sealcoating policy. He believed that a <br /> proper sealcoating schedule would assist the City in maintaining its roadways in the future. <br /> Assistant City Engineer Anderson commented that the City has increased the frequency with <br /> which roadways are sealcoated in recent years. <br /> Mayor Grant requested that staff provide Councilmember Woodburn with information on the <br /> sealcoating schedule for the past several years. <br /> Councilmember Woodburn was in favor of a reclamation project noting that the current road <br /> survived 40+ years with the current soil conditions. <br />