My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-23-15-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
02-23-15-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/20/2015 5:38:44 PM
Creation date
2/20/2015 5:22:46 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
315
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – JANUARY 20, 2015 2 <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding the correlation between transit and jobs as well as the importance of <br />housing density and tax base. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden expressed concern about building too much office space as there was <br />already a surplus in the area. <br /> <br />Mr. Ruff commented that a corporate user would be a great option for TCAAP. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant discussed the comments the Council received from Mattamy Homes at a previous <br />work session. He questioned where the County’s concerns derived. <br /> <br />County Commissioner Huffman stated that one concern for the TCAAP site was whether the <br />market could support higher density housing in the Town Center. He indicated that with the <br />City’s proposed housing numbers, the site was at risk of not meeting the County’s goals for jobs. <br />He stated that the County would like to see a block-by-block fit analysis of TCAAP to better <br />understand how many housing units would fit on the site. He recommended that the Council have <br />Kimley-Horn reevaluate and ensure that the numbers are correct. He indicated that the County <br />would fund this Kimley-Horn study. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung indicated that the Council has not been close to the 1,300 housing <br />unit number that is shown in the chart on page 8 of the PowerPoint presentation. <br /> <br />County Commissioner Huffman wanted to see the proposed housing unit numbers developed on <br />the site more closely meet the County’s plan in order to ensure the area’s transit needs would be <br />met. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant stated that a fit analysis would delay the approval of the TRC and questioned if that <br />would be acceptable to the County. <br /> <br />County Commissioner Huffman understood that the TRC may be delayed but stated that the <br />County would have much more market confidence if the fit analysis was completed. He reported <br />that Mr. Ruff and Heather Worthington, Deputy County Manager for Ramsey County, were on <br />board with this recommendation as well. He reiterated that it was much more important to get the <br />TRC done right than having it done on a certain date. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung expressed concern that the County’s goals were too broad and had no <br />numerical value attached. He was surprised that the County was just bringing these issues to the <br />Council now. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden stated that since the beginning of this process, the County has been <br />influencing the master planning with such input as the location of the spine road, etc. She <br />questioned when the City’s needs would be considered. <br /> <br />County Commissioner Huffman explained that the fit analysis would just provide the City and <br />the County with some firm numbers. He did not want the TRC to become a lose-win situation. <br />He understood that the City also had needs. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.