My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-19-14-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
05-19-14-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2015 12:04:01 PM
Creation date
2/26/2015 12:03:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION— MAY 19, 2014 8 <br /> Councilmember Holmes agreed and recommended that the 50/50 funding approach be <br /> eliminated due to the fact the County is 100%responsible for this expense. <br /> City Administrator Klaers reported that the JPA states that the City will share the financing <br /> expense of some of the surface water costs. <br /> Ms. Kvilvang reported that she could go back to the County and state that the Council's <br /> preference is for the County to finance 100% of the surface water expense, and the City will <br /> charge a STAC fee on development that will assist with the repayment of this expense. <br /> Mayor Grant indicated that the Council still needed clarification regarding what is considered an <br /> "enhancement". <br /> Councilmember Holmes believed that making the site more marketable should not be considered <br /> an enhancement; and therefore, the expense becomes 100%the County's responsibility. <br /> Councilmember Holden commented that the Council has no idea how to make the site more <br /> marketable. However, she does know that the Council does not want a ditch running along the <br /> entire spine road. <br /> Councilmember McClung indicated that the Council may find that because of the amount of <br /> water on the TCAAP site, the baseline storm water requirements might equate to something <br /> desirable. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked if the Council had any time constraints for making a decision <br /> regarding this matter. <br /> Ms. Kvilvang stated that the Council would have to set expectations, define what risk should be <br /> assumed by the City and the County, and determine what items would be the responsibility of the <br /> land developers. All of these answers would need to be known prior to the spine road going for <br /> bid. <br /> Public Works Director Maurer anticipated that the numbers for the storm sewer ponding would <br /> become clearer within the next six months. <br /> Councilmember Holden questioned what the development fee would be. <br /> Ms. Kvilvang stated that she could provide an upper and lower range for the total development <br /> fees. <br /> Councilmember Holden recommended that the County finance the storm water ponding as this <br /> is their responsibility, and that the City will negotiate the shortages. <br /> Mayor Grant supported this recommendation and stated that the City still needs to define what <br /> was meant by"enhancements". <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.