Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JANUARY 26, 2015 12 <br /> <br />property, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the January 26, 2015, Report to <br />the City Council, as amended by the following five (5) conditions: <br /> <br />1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the submitted plans as amended by the <br />conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City <br />Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. <br />2. Final building plans shall be subject to approval by the City Building Official and the Fire <br />Marshal prior to the issuance of a building permit. <br />3. If the property owner applies for building permits to remodel the remaining unoccupied <br />area of the existing building, the City reserves the right to evaluate parking on the site at <br />that time. <br />4. If it is determined that the provided off-street parking is not sufficient, the property owner <br />will be required to construct an adequate number of parking stalls on the site or to secure <br />off-site parking stalls located within eight hundred (800) feet of the main entrance to the <br />building. Any agreement for use of off-site parking will be documented with a legal <br />instrument approved by the City Attorney. <br />5. The property shall not be used for warehousing and distribution uses beyond the proposed <br />storage for off-season items for the Frattallone’s Hardware Inc. store operations. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked how the parking lot would be improved. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler explained that the parking lot would be resurfaced and restriped. He <br />reported that the new lighting and tree plantings will be installed in association with the County <br />Road E improvement project. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden questioned if the Site Plan approval would remain with the property. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler stated that the reduced number of parking stalls would remain only <br />with the proposed use. If the property was sold and the use changed, another Site Plan Review <br />process may be required. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden inquired if a building permit would be required if the office or <br />unoccupied warehouse space were remodeled. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler stated that a building permit would be required. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant recommended that Condition #3 be revised and that a Site Plan Review be required <br />if any changes were made to the building. <br /> <br />Councilmember Woodburn suggested that Condition #5 be removed. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler indicated that warehousing was only allowed as an accessory use in <br />the B-2 Zoning District, which led staff to include Condition #5 in its recommendation for <br />approval. He commented that if warehousing were to become a more significant component or <br />use of the building, it could move away from being an accessory use to a principle use. <br />