My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-13-15-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
04-13-15-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2015 11:58:16 AM
Creation date
4/13/2015 12:41:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—APRIL 13, 2015 4 <br /> Mayor Grant did not support Option 2 of the Fit Test. He believed that no matter the number of <br /> units on TCAAP, the product types can be diversified. He recommended that this argument be <br /> avoided. He believed that the Hill and Town neighborhoods would benefit from more flexibility. <br /> He feared that it would be difficult for people to build to exact zoning classifications, and for this <br /> reason,the Council was recommending more flexibility. <br /> Mayor Grant did not like the way the Hill neighborhood was redesigned. He understood that the <br /> County wanted to achieve a nice taxable value for the property, but he also wanted to create <br /> unique and desirable neighborhoods that are not overly dense. He saw the value in the Fit Test <br /> and learned a great deal about how the Town neighborhood should be designed. <br /> Mr. Lamb provided further comment on the Creek neighborhood as discussed with Ms. Bujold <br /> from Maxfield. He indicated that she felt it would be appropriate for this neighborhood to have <br /> larger single family lots abutting the creek and smaller lots to the central portion of the Creek. <br /> The density should then be increased in the other portions of the Creek neighborhood. <br /> Councilmember Holmes expressed concern that none of this information has been provided to <br /> the Council and differed greatly from the previous Maxfield Study and developer information that <br /> the Council has received. <br /> Councilmember Holden hoped that the County would provide the City with additional <br /> information regarding how the property would be marketed as well as address the water feature in <br /> the near future. <br /> Mr. Ruff stated that there are always uncertainties with development. He provided further <br /> comment on how municipal entities can manage land sales. He suggested that the City Attorney <br /> and JDA Attorney work through and discuss the issues surrounding the land sales. <br /> Mayor Grant explained that the Council would need to consider how to amend the TRC given <br /> the new information that has been provided to the City. <br /> City Administrator Klaers discussed the Council's meeting schedule and upcoming agenda <br /> items. <br /> Mayor Grant was in favor of moving forward and taking action on the TRC. He wanted to see <br /> the City and County make some headway on the water feature and some other outstanding issues. <br /> Councilmember McClung was prepared to meet when necessary in order to get the TRC <br /> approved. However, he did not see how the City could bridge the differences between Fit Test <br /> Option 2 and the City's TRC. <br /> City Administrator Klaers stated that the City has learned a lot from the Fit Test. He believed <br /> that the City Council needed to digest this information and would then need to review the TRC in <br /> detail in order to keep this item moving forward. <br /> Mayor Grant recessed the City Council work session at 6:58 p.m. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.