Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS EDA JOINT MEETING WITH EDC – JANUARY 26, 2015 6 <br />Mr. Weinhagen stated that he believed that a BRE program could have helped with this <br />situation because it would have established a relationship between Smiths Medical and the City <br />of Arden Hills. It was his hope that after the BRE plan was in place, the first call for companies <br />in need of additional space would be to the City and not to a broker. Further discussion ensued <br />regarding the Smiths Medical situation, and he noted that relationships play a major role in where <br />companies decide to locate. <br /> <br />Commissioner Heikkila stated that the $5,000 cost for the BRE plan was quite small when <br />compared to the loss of an Arden Hills business. <br /> <br />Commissioners Erickson and Radziej stated their support for undertaking the BRE program in <br />2015. <br /> <br />EDA Commissioner Holden wanted to see the information gathered for the plan remain secure <br />in the City for years to come. <br /> <br />MOTION: EDA Commissioner Holden moved and EDA Commissioner McClung <br />seconded a motion to approve the Business Retention and Expansion Service <br />Proposal submitted by the St. Paul Area Chamber of Commerce (SPACC). <br />The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />C. 2015 EDA Work Plan <br /> <br />Secretary Klaers stated that last year the EDA met four times. In January, the EDA met jointly <br />with the EDC to review the activities undertaken the previous year and to review the upcoming <br />work plan. In April, the EDA discussed the EDA Budgets and the Revolving Loan program. <br />Also in April, the EDA discussed having fewer EDA meetings while the City Council <br />concentrates on and dedicates time to the TCAAP redevelopment project. In September and in <br />December, the EDA considered the 2015 EDA budgets. <br /> <br />Secretary Klaers commented that, with the April 2014 EDA discussion in mind, he was looking <br />for EDA input on an acceptable 2015 work plan. Items that could be included are as follows: <br /> <br />TIF District #2 – This District is scheduled to be decertified in 2015. Staff will monitor this <br />District and recommend EDA action as necessary to be in compliance with State law. <br /> <br />TIF District #3 – This District is for the Cottage Villas project. This District has up to $500,000 <br />that can be used for qualified housing projects. The EDA should consider options for how to best <br />use these funds. The District is scheduled to be decertified in 2019. <br /> <br />EDA General Fund Operating Budget – The 2016 EDA budgets will need to be reviewed and <br />approved. A sustainable revenue source needs to be identified to finance EDA operating <br />expenses. These operating expenses are mainly: staff time and overhead, supplies, and contracts <br />for services. <br />