Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – MARCH 16, 2015 3 <br /> <br />Councilmember Woodburn stated that he understood that Caribou was providing a service to <br />the public and that Caribou knows what is best for its customers. He supported the request. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung believed that the drive-thru was extremely tight and he had concern <br />with how emergency vehicles would access the site. He agreed that the City Code language <br />regarding drive-thrus should be reevaluated. He commented that he was neutral on the request at <br />this time. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes supported the drive-thru request and noted that Caribou knew their <br />business. Her only concern was with the landscaping triangle as she thought it should be removed <br />to allow easier turning movements within the drive-thru. <br /> <br />Mr. Meyer commented that the landscaping island offered a pedestrian connection that may be <br />able to be shifted. He stated that it would make more sense to align this with the sidewalk along <br />the front of the retail center. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant encouraged Caribou to consider this option along with where snow would be stored <br />in the winter months given the fact that the space was tight. <br /> <br />Mr. Meyer thanked the Council for their input. <br /> <br />A. Joint Meeting With Planning Commission <br /> <br />City Planner Streff stated that the City Council has asked the Planning Commission to join the <br />Council for a joint work session to discuss the 2015 Planning Commission Work Plan and other <br />planning-related items. He noted that the Planning Commission reviewed the draft work plan at a <br />work session following their regular meeting on March 4, 2015. <br /> <br />City Planner Streff indicated that the City Council was being asked to provide input and <br />feedback on the draft work plan, and to discuss other planning-related items. <br /> <br />Planning Chair Thompson thanked the Council for their time. She stated that she believed that <br />the Commission has had great conversations with staff about the Planning Commission’s goals <br />and objectives. It was her opinion that feedback from the City Council would be valuable in order <br />to provide proper focus to the group. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant suggested that the Commission discuss the Planned Unit Development (PUD) <br />amendment process. He wanted to see this process become more guided. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung agreed and believed that the City was often giving more than it was <br />getting in return with PUD amendment requests. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes discussed a potential 10% rule for PUD amendments and noted that <br />each request was unique. <br /> <br />Further discussion ensued regarding the PUD amendment process. <br />