My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-27-15-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
04-27-15-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/24/2015 2:36:57 PM
Creation date
4/24/2015 2:33:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – MARCH 30, 2015 2 <br /> <br />Mr. Lamb provided further comment on how the two options would work together subjectively <br />to assist the County and City in planning for Rice Creek Commons. He reported that the Fit Test <br />was focused on market potential, economic development, job growth, and environmental <br />stewardship. These factors were the driving factors for the County. He discussed development <br />prospects within the metro area. He reviewed the proposed lot sizes for residential <br />neighborhoods. He summarized housing trends and family sizes and how this would impact the <br />housing market. <br /> <br />Mr. Lamb stated that after reviewing his Fit Test Option 1 findings, he believed that the Creek <br />Neighborhood could yield 111 total units on the 41 acres, which would be roughly 2.7 units per <br />acre. He stated the Hill Neighborhood would have 29 NB1 lots, 80 NB2 lots and 85 NB3 lots <br />with 29 twinhomes, which would yield 223 total units. He noted that the park in the Hill <br />Neighborhood has been shifted slightly to allow for lots to be fronted along the park. <br /> <br />Mr. Lamb discussed the Town Neighborhood. Option 1 included 680 multi-family and row <br />house units in the Town Center District. An additional 304 attached and detached townhomes <br />were shown in the Neighborhood Transition 1 and 2 Districts. The retail mixed use area included <br />40,000 square feet of retail. The total number of units proposed for the entire Rice Creek <br />Commons development in Option 1 was 1318. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes asked for clarification on the housing numbers. <br /> <br />Mr. Lamb reviewed his Fit Test findings in further detail with the Council. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant clarified that this was one scenario that was being presented but that it was not <br />necessarily the scenario that would be chosen. <br /> <br />Mr. Lamb stated that this was the case noting that he was trying to provide an option that would <br />provide the highest yield. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung asked if the proposed row houses would serve as a buffer next to the <br />multi-family housing. <br /> <br />Mr. Lamb indicated that the row houses would serve as a buffer. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant was concerned that the Fit Test did not include property tax values, given the fact <br />that this was a concern to the County. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung requested that phase two of the Fit Test include this information. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant questioned how the City and County would reach a final design plan. <br /> <br />Mr. Lamb believed that the marketplace would determine the final design and that the Fit Test <br />would provide information regarding how many units could fit on the site. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant inquired how rents impact property values. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.