Laserfiche WebLink
Ryan B. Streff January 16, 2015 <br />City of Arden Hills Page 3 <br />In addition to the intersection turning movement counts, observations were completed to identify <br />roadway characteristics within the study area (i.e. roadway geometry, posted speed limits, and traffic <br />controls). Currently, Lexington Avenue is primarily a four-lane divided roadway with a posted speed <br />limit of 40 miles per hour (mph), although there are segments that have a continuous center two-way <br />left-turn lane. Red Fox Road and other study roadways are two-lane roadways with 30 mph speed <br />limits. The Red Fox Road/Lexington Avenue intersection is signalized, while other study intersections <br />are side-street stop controlled. It should be noted that Lexington Avenue is functionally classified as <br />a minor arterial, while other study roadways are functionally classified as local streets. Existing <br />geometrics, traffic controls, and volumes within the study area are shown in Figure 2. <br />Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis <br />An existing intersection capacity analysis was completed using Synchro/SimTraffic software (V8.0) to <br />establish a baseline condition to which future traffic operations could be compared. Capacity analysis <br />results identify a Level of Service (LOS) which indicates how well an intersection is operating. <br />Intersections are ranked from LOS A through LOS F. The LOS results are based on average delay <br />per vehicle, which correspond to the delay threshold values shown in Table 1. LOS A indicates the <br />best traffic operation, while LOS F indicates an intersection where demand exceeds capacity. Overall <br />intersection LOS A though LOS D is generally considered acceptable in the Twin Cities area. <br />Table 1. Level of Service Criteria for Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections <br />LOS Designation Signalized Intersection <br />Average Delay/Vehicle (seconds) <br />Unsignalized Intersection <br />Average Delay/Vehicle (seconds) <br />A ≤ 10 ≤ 10 <br />B > 10 - 20 > 10 - 15 <br />C > 20 - 35 > 15 - 25 <br />D > 35 - 55 > 25 - 35 <br />E > 55 - 80 > 35 - 50 <br />F > 80 > 50 <br />For side-street stop controlled intersections, special emphasis is given to providing an estimate for the <br />level of service of the side-street approach. Traffic operations at an unsignalized intersection with side- <br />street stop control can be described in two ways. First, consideration is given to the overall intersection <br />level of service. This takes into account the total number of vehicles entering the intersection and the <br />capability of the intersection to support these volumes. Second, it is important to consider the delay <br />on the minor approach. Since the mainline does not have to stop, the majority of delay is attributed <br />to the side-street approaches. It is typical of intersections with higher mainline traffic volumes to <br />experience high levels of delay (i.e. poor levels of service) on the side-street approaches, but an <br />acceptable overall intersection level of service during peak hour conditions.