My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-07-15-PC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2010-2019
>
PC Packets 2015
>
01-07-15-PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2015 4:28:40 PM
Creation date
5/1/2015 4:23:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Plan Evaluation <br /> <br />1. Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) <br /> <br />The City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan lays out the future land uses that are anticipated for all <br />properties within the City. Based on the future land uses, the City can plan for improvements, <br />anticipate infrastructure needs, and create appropriate land use regulations. The City’s Zoning <br />Code identifies specific zoning districts through which the land uses and goals in the <br />Comprehensive Plan can be implemented. The zoning cannot conflict with the future land use <br />designation. When there is a conflict between a city’s comprehensive plan and a zoning code, <br />the city is required to amend the zoning code to comply with the comprehensive plan, unless the <br />city approves an amendment to the comprehensive plan. The Metropolitan Council has the final <br />determination as to whether to allow a CPA or not, though they provide great deference to the <br />City as long as the proposed land use change does not have a negative impact on a regional <br />system (i.e. transportation, sanitary sewer, and regional parks). <br /> <br />A city has broad discretion when reviewing whether to rezone a property or amend its <br />Comprehensive Plan. Questions to consider include whether or not the proposed project <br />forwards the broader goals and vision for the City? Would the rezoned property allow for a <br />better development than the current zoning would permit? Is the proposed zoning district <br />appropriate to that particular location? Would the proposed change forward the goals of the <br />comprehensive plan? <br /> <br />As part of the CPA for the Valentine Cove project, a change in land use designation from Public <br />Institutional (1941 County Road E2) and Neighborhood Business (1901 County Road E2) to <br />Very Low Density Residential at approximately 1.71 units per acre is being requested. The <br />City’s 2030 Future Land Use Map would be amended to re-designate the property to reflect the <br />change in land use classification. The Very Low Density Residential land use category allows for <br />development at a net density of 1.5 to 3 units per acre. Net density is defined as the number of <br />dwelling units per acre of land when the acreage involved includes only land for residential uses <br />and excludes arterial street rights of way, wetlands and water features, and other publicly <br />dedicated improvements, such as parks. <br /> <br />If the City approves the CPA, one of the conditions of approval will be that the project is <br />contingent on final approval from the Metropolitan Council. The request for the Future Land <br />Use Map amendment will need to be submitted to the Metropolitan Council by the City. The <br />Metropolitan Council then has 60 days to review the application, though due to the small size of <br />the project and the lack of negative impacts, the City will be requesting a shortened review <br />timeline of 14 days. Once the Metropolitan Council completes their review, they will notify the <br />City of their decision. If the CPA is approved, the applicant can move forward with filing the <br />Final Plat and applying for development permits. <br /> <br />The City must also allow adjacent governments, affected special districts, and affected school <br />districts up to 60 days to review the comprehensive plan amendment. This waiting period allows <br /> <br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Meeting for January 7, 2014 <br /> <br />P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-034 - Valentine Cove - Plat and PUD\Memos_Reports_14-034 <br />Page 4 of 14
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.