Laserfiche WebLink
RELEVANT LINKS: <br /> Even if a private employer allows this type of use, it is important to be <br />aware that in the event of a public-records request under the MGDPA or a <br />discovery request in litigation, the private employer may be compelled to <br />have a search done of a councilmember’s email communications on the <br />private employer’s equipment or to restore files from a backup or archive. <br />See Handbook, Chapter 27 <br />for more information about <br />records management. <br />What may work best is to use a free, third-party email service, such as <br />gmail or Hotmail, for your city account and to avoid using that email <br />account for any personal email or for anything that may constitute an <br />official record of city business since such records must be retained in <br />accordance with the state records retention requirements. <br /> H. Advisory opinions <br /> 1. Department of Administration <br />Minn. Stat. § 13.072, subd. 1 <br />(b). See IPAD for an index of <br />advisory opinions. <br />The commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Administration has <br />authority to issue non-binding advisory opinions on certain issues related <br />to the open meeting law. A $200 fee is required. The Information Policy <br />Analysis Division (IPAD) handles these requests. <br />See Requesting an Open <br />Meeting Law Advisory <br />Opinion from IPAD. <br />A public body subject to the open meeting law can request an advisory <br />opinion. A person who disagrees with the manner in which members of a <br />governing body perform their duties under the open meeting law can also <br />request an advisory opinion. <br /> 2. Attorney General <br />Minn. Stat. § 8.07. See index <br />of Attorney General <br />Advisory Opinions from <br />1993 to present. <br />The Minnesota Attorney General is authorized to issue written advisory <br />opinions to city attorneys on “questions of public importance.” The <br />Attorney General has issued several advisory opinions on the open <br />meeting law. <br /> I. Penalties <br />Minn. Stat. § 13D.06, subd. <br />1. <br /> <br />Claude v. Collins, 518 <br />N.W.2d 836 (Minn. 1994). <br />Any person who intentionally violates the open meeting law is subject to <br />personal liability in the form of a civil penalty of up to $300 for a single <br />occurrence. The public body may not pay the penalty. A court may take <br />into account a councilmember’s time and experience in office to determine <br />the amount of the civil penalty. <br />Minn. Stat. § 13D.06, subd. <br />2. <br />O’Keefe v. Carter, No. A12- <br />0811 (Minn. Ct. App. 2012) <br />(unpublished opinion). <br />An action to enforce this penalty may be brought by any person in any <br />court of competent jurisdiction where the administrative office of the <br />governing body is located. <br />League of Minnesota Cities Handbook for Minnesota Cities 10/2/2014 <br />Meetings, Motions, Resolutions, and Ordinances Chapter 7 | Page 23