Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – APRIL 20, 2015 3 <br /> <br />to schedule Rice Creek Commons (TCAAP) as the topic for this April 20, 2015, work session for <br />further discussion. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant questioned how the Council wanted to proceed with the TRC given the information <br />that was provided to the City from the Fit Test. He reported that Fit Test Option 2 does not work <br />for him. He suggested that the Council review the neighborhoods one at a time and work through <br />the housing styles and density. He proposed that the Council begin discussion with the Creek and <br />move to the Hill neighborhood. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung believed that a big picture, broad view of the TRC had to be <br />considered prior to taking this approach. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant was encouraged by what the Council learned from the Fit Test regarding the Town <br />neighborhood, as it may be overly dense and require more flexibility. He understood that the <br />County wanted to see more flexibility. However, he did not understand how this worked into the <br />City’s vision, especially with the Hill and Creek neighborhoods. He wanted to ensure that the <br />Council’s vision was realized on the TCAAP property. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes requested further information on the Land Use Plan. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Hutmacher discussed how the City would use the Land Use <br />Plan for the TCAAP site. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung stated that if the Council supported the Land Use Plan as it stands <br />today, the City would not be able to practically meet the maximum density of 1480 units within <br />the TRC. He commented that flexibility would have to be written into the TRC in order to reach <br />the proposed number of units. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Hutmacher stated that this was the case. She reported that <br />if the Council supported 1480 units on TCAAP, staff would appreciate direction in order to begin <br />making adjustments to the TRC to achieve this number. <br /> <br />Councilmember Woodburn was in favor of looking at the overall density instead of a specific <br />number. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden explained that she has been running the numbers and did not want to <br />see the site over-developed. It was her opinion that Fit Test Option 2 was too dense. She was in <br />favor of seeing more detail on how the residential roadways would be connected throughout the <br />neighborhoods. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Maurer reported that the County has given up on the idea of bringing a <br />roadway from County Road I to the Creek neighborhood. He asked the County to split the <br />entrance road to the Creek neighborhood for safety purposes. <br /> <br />The Council further discussed Neighborhood district density. <br />