Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – May 6, 2015 2 <br /> <br />overcome the limitations of zoning regulations and improve the overall design of a project. <br />While the PUD process allows the City to negotiate certain aspects of the development, any <br />conditions imposed on the PUD must have a rational basis related to the expected impact of the <br />development. A PUD cannot be used to permit uses that would not otherwise be permitted in the <br />underlying zoning district. <br /> <br />Site Data <br />Land Use Plan: Light Industrial and Office <br />Existing Land Use: Commercial <br />Zoning: G-B: Gateway Business District <br />Current Lot Sizes: 121,096 square feet (2.78 acres) <br />Proposed Density: N/A <br />Topography: Relatively level <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler reviewed the surrounding area and the Plan Review noting staff has <br />two primary concerns about Holiday’s proposal for accent lighting. First, the lighting is <br />intentionally designed to have a blue hue in order to further brand the site as a Holiday service <br />station. Holiday has installed similar light fixtures on many of the canopies, buildings, and <br />monument signs at their other locations in the metro region. The effect of the accent lighting <br />would be to turn the length of the canopy and building roofline into architectural advertising for <br />the business. The Planning Commission may wish to consider the precedent that could be set if <br />the City approves this type of lighting fixture, which also has a commercial branding purpose. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler indicated that the second issue identified in the staff evaluation is the <br />glare that would result from the accent lighting. Staff has discussed with the applicant the need to <br />minimize the visual impact of the lighting through improved design. A different manufacturer <br />would be used for the proposed accent lights than the LED lighting that is now installed on the <br />monument sign on the property. However, staff believes that the lighting would still create glare <br />that could have a negative impact for those travelling along Highway 96 and Round Lake Road, <br />as well as for residents in the Arden Manor manufactured home park and residents on the east <br />side of Round Lake. Staff has included two conditions for the Planning Commission’s <br />consideration if a motion to approve is made that would require the accent lighting and the <br />existing LED lights on the monument sign to be dimmed during nighttime hours to reduce their <br />visual impact. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler reported that the Planned Unit Development process provides <br />additional flexibility that an underlying zoning district would not otherwise allow. It is intended <br />to overcome the limitations of zoning regulations and to achieve a higher quality project than <br />would otherwise be possible. In considering whether to grant a PUD Amendment in this case, the <br />Planning Commission should consider if the proposal forwards the goals of the City’s <br />Comprehensive Plan and is in the best interest of the community. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler indicated that the Planning Commission must make a finding as to <br />whether or not the proposed application would adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood or <br />the community as a whole based on the aforementioned factors. Staff offers the following <br />eighteen (18) findings of fact for consideration: <br />