Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—APRIL 20, 2015 6 <br /> Mayor Grant asked if Councilmember Holden's plan for the Creek was a reflection of Fit Test <br /> Option 1 or Option 2. <br /> Councilmember Holden stated that her plan did not align with either Fit Test but more closely <br /> coordinated with the Land Use Plan. She explained that her numbers offered additional flexibility <br /> to a future developer. <br /> Councilmember McClung believed that the suggested flexibility would work for both the Hill <br /> and Creek neighborhoods. However, the Town neighborhood would need different consideration. <br /> Councilmember Woodburn stated that he would appreciate less density. <br /> Councilmember Holden understood this concern, but wanted to see flexibility written into the <br /> proposed neighborhoods through varying lots sizes in order to create a diverse housing stock. <br /> Community Development Director Hutmacher summarized the Council's direction with regard <br /> to the Creek neighborhood. It was noted that the number of lots would be changed. She believed <br /> that the proposed numbers from Council would assist staff in more closely aligning the TRC with <br /> the Land Use Plan. <br /> Mayor Grant believed it would be difficult for staff to come to an exact number, but rather, he <br /> wanted to see assurances that the Council's vision was being met. <br /> Councilmember Woodburn stated that he did not want to see any NB-3 on TCAAP. He <br /> supported 11,000 square foot lots on the site. <br /> Councilmember McClung did not believe the Council had a clear vision at this time and that it <br /> would be difficult for staff to establish a density number without clarifying this vision. <br /> Mayor Grant understood there were differing opinions on the Council and that the vision for <br /> TCAAP needed further clarification. However, the three distinct neighborhoods have not been <br /> disputed, only the number of units and sizes of lots within each neighborhood. He thanked the <br /> Council for their input and turned the discussion to the Hill neighborhood. <br /> Councilmember McClung commented that his same concerns apply to the Hill neighborhood as <br /> with the Creek. <br /> Councilmember Holmes reported that the Land Use Plan calls for 268 total units in the Hill. She <br /> thought that what the Council discussed with the densities in the Creek neighborhood could also <br /> be applied to the Hill. She indicated that Fit Test Option 1 has 223 units and Fit Test Option 2 has <br /> 462 units. She was troubled by Option 2 as it would double the number of units within this <br /> neighborhood. She supported this neighborhood more closely reflecting Option 1. She <br /> questioned why the acreage in the Hill neighborhood decreased by four acres between Option 1 <br /> and Option 2. <br /> Community Development Director Hutmacher explained that this was due to a reduction in the <br /> size of the parks. <br />