Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Meeting for March 4, 2015 <br /> <br />P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-003 - CSM - Site Plan Review & Variance - Parking Lot\Memos_Reports_15-003 <br />Page 7 of 8 <br /> <br />4. That a Grading and Erosion Control Permit shall be issued by the City before the <br />commencement of any construction, grading or disturbance of soil within the parking <br />lot area. <br /> <br /> <br />Options <br /> <br />1. Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case <br />15-003 for a Site Plan Review & Variance to expand the existing parking lot at 4293 <br />Lexington Avenue North, based on the findings of fact, the submitted plans, and the four (4) <br />conditions in the March 4, 2015, Report to the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />2. Recommend Approval as Submitted: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 15- <br />003 for a Site Plan Review & Variance to expand the existing parking lot at 4293 Lexington <br />Avenue North, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the March 4, 2015, <br />Report to the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />3. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 15-003 for a Site Plan <br />Review & Variance to expand the existing parking lot at 4293 Lexington Avenue North, <br />based on the following findings of fact… <br /> <br />4. Table: Motion to table Planning Case 15-003 for a Site Plan Review & Variance to expand <br />the existing parking lot at 4293 Lexington Avenue North: a specific reason and/or <br />information request should be included with a motion to table. <br /> <br /> <br />Notice <br /> <br />Although a Site Plan Review does not require a public hearing, a public meeting notice was <br />prepared by the City and mailed to properties within three-hundred fifty (350) feet of the subject <br />property. <br /> <br /> <br />Resident Comment <br /> <br />Staff has not received any letters, e-mails, or telephone calls from property owners or residents in <br />regards to this planning case. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />