My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-04-15-PC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2010-2019
>
PC Packets 2015
>
03-04-15-PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2015 1:25:36 PM
Creation date
6/3/2015 1:20:28 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RCWDPermitNumber14-105 <br />Soilsonsiteareprimarilysiltysand (HSGB) topsoil, underlainbysandyleanclays (HSGD) soils. <br />Thus, infiltration isnotconsideredfeasibleandfiltrationisacceptabletomeetthewaterquality <br />requirement. PerRuleC.6(c)(1), theWaterQualityrequirement is2.2-inchesoverthe <br />new/reconstructedarea (35,000± SF) foratotalrequirementof6,417± cubicfeet. Runofffromthe <br />drivewaysisroutedtodepressionalareasinthefrontandcollectedviadraintiletoafiltration <br />trenchinthebackyard, whichwillalsocatchsheetflowfromtherearroofs. Eachlothasa <br />separatetrenchanddrain-tilesystem. Thisprovidesadequatepre-treatment. Thetrenchesare <br />expectedtodraw-downwithin48-hours. Thetrencheshaveprovided3-feetoffiltermaterial <br />abovethedraintile. Groundwaterwasnotencountered. Approximately90% oftheprojectarea <br />hasbeentreated. AdditionaltreatmentorTSSremovalisnotfeasible. Thustheapplicanthas <br />compliedwiththeRuleC.9(c) designrequirementsandprovidedadequatevolumetomeetthe <br />RuleC.6WaterQualityRequirement. <br />2-year (cfs) 10-year (cfs) 100-year (cfs) DrainageArea Existing Proposed Existing Proposed Existing Proposed <br />Westernpropertyline 2.94 0.34 5.22 0.80 10.72 1.99 <br />Eastandsouthern 4.22 1.71 8.04 4.96 17.41 19.88propertyline <br />Totals 7.16 2.05 13.26 5.76 28.13 21.87 <br />10.61 22.5080% ofExisting 5.73 <br />TheprojectislocatedwithintheFloodManagementZone. AsallthedrainageflowstoFarrel’s <br />wetland, theincreaseshownatthe100-yearattheeastern/southernpropertylinewillnothavean <br />adverseimpact. TheprojecthascompliedwiththeRuleC.7requirements. Theprojectwillnot <br />haveameasurableeffectontheFarrel’swetlandcomplex, whichcomplieswiththebounceand <br />inundationcriteriaofRuleC.8. TheprojectcomplieswiththefreeboardrequirementsofRule <br />C.9(g). <br />3. Wetlands – Awetlanddelineationwithboundaryapprovalwasconductedforthesiteunder <br />reviewfile14-169R. Theprojectwillnotimpactanywetlands. <br />4. Floodplain – Theregulatory floodplainelevationfortheFarrel’swetlandcomplexis878.5 <br />NAVD88). Theprojectwillnotimpacttheregulatoryfloodplain. <br />5. ErosionControl – Proposederosioncontrolmethodsincludesiltfence, arockconstruction <br />entrance, inletprotectionandriprap. AnNPDESpermitisrequiredfortheproject. The <br />informationlistedundertheErosionandSedimentationControlRecommendationsmustbe <br />submitted. Otherwise, theprojectcomplieswithRCWDRuleDrequirements. <br />6. DocumentingEasementsandMaintenance Obligations – Applicantmustprovidedraftdrainage <br />andflowageeasements (ifrequiredbytheCity), andadraftmaintenance declarationforreview, <br />andreceiptshowingrecordationonceapproved. <br />7. PreviousPermitInformation – Awetland delineationwasconductedforthesiteunderreview <br />file14-169R. <br />HoustonEngineering Inc Page4of4 2/25/2015
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.