My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-08-15-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2010-2019
>
PC Packets 2015
>
04-08-15-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2015 1:28:35 PM
Creation date
6/3/2015 1:28:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RELEVANT LINKS: <br /> 1. Labor negotiations <br />Minn. Stat. § 13D.03, subd. 1 <br />(b). <br />IPAD 13-012. <br />Minn. Stat. §§ 179A.01-.25. <br />The city council may, by majority vote in a public meeting, decide to hold <br />a closed meeting to consider its strategy for labor negotiations, including <br />negotiation strategies or developments or discussion of labor-negotiation <br />proposals conducted pursuant to sections 179A.01 to 179A.25. The <br />council must announce the time and place of the closed meeting at the <br />public meeting. <br />Minn. Stat. § 13D.03, subds. <br />1 (d), 2. <br />IPAD 05-027. <br />IPAD 00-037. <br />After the closed meeting, a written record of all members of the city <br />council and all other people present must be available to the public. The <br />council must tape-record the proceedings at city expense and preserve the <br />tape for two years after signing the contract. The tape-recording must be <br />available to the public after all labor contracts are signed for the current <br />budget period. <br />Minn. Stat. § 13D.03, subd. <br />3. If someone claims the council conducted public business other than labor <br />negotiations at the closed meeting, a court must privately review the <br />recording of the meeting. If the court finds the law was not violated, the <br />action must be dismissed and the recording sealed and preserved. If the <br />court determines a violation of the open meeting law may exist, the <br />recording may be introduced at trial in its entirety, subject to any <br />protective orders requested by either party and deemed appropriate by the <br />court. <br /> 2. Not-public data under the Minnesota Government <br />Data Practices Act <br />Minn. Stat. § 13D.05, subd. <br />2. The general rule is that meetings cannot be closed to discuss data that are <br />not public under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. A <br />meeting must be closed, however, if certain not-public data is discussed. <br /> Any portion of a meeting must be closed if expressly required by law or if <br />any of the following types of not-public data are discussed: <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Minn. Stat. §§ 144.291-.298. <br />• Data that would identify victims or reporters of criminal sexual <br />conduct, domestic abuse, or maltreatment of minors or vulnerable <br />adults. <br />• Active investigative data created by a law-enforcement agency, or <br />internal-affairs data relating to allegations of law-enforcement <br />personnel misconduct. <br />• Educational, health, medical, welfare, or mental-health data that are <br />not public data. <br />• Certain medical records. <br />League of Minnesota Cities Handbook for Minnesota Cities 10/2/2014 <br />Meetings, Motions, Resolutions, and Ordinances Chapter 7 | Page 14
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.