My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-08-15-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
06-08-15-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2015 10:47:52 AM
Creation date
6/5/2015 10:44:01 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – APRIL 27, 2015 4 <br /> <br />2. 1691 Crystal Avenue $5,158.30 <br /> <br />Assistant City Engineer Anderson stated that the 1998 project reconstructed Fairview Avenue <br />from Lake Valentine Road to Gramsie Road. It affected four properties in the current assessment <br />project. The following list provides the property address and the amount of the 1998 assessment: <br /> <br />1. 1759 Crystal Avenue $3,598.20 <br />2. 1758 Crystal Avenue $3,998.00 <br />3. 1761 Gramsie Road $3,998.00 <br />4. 1777 Gramsie Road $3,998.00 <br /> <br />Assistant City Engineer Anderson indicated that these six properties are in the current <br />assessment roll. There were a number of comments about these lots at the public hearing. The <br />minutes from the January 12, 2015, public hearing are included in the agenda packet as is an <br />exhibit showing these properties. The Council is being asked by staff to give direction on these six <br />properties. They could be left in the project at full assessment amounts, they could be removed <br />from the project and not assessed, or they could be left in the project but given some or full credit <br />for the previous assessment paid. When the Council considers adoption of the resolution adopting <br />the assessment roll, staff will need direction on how to deal with these six properties. If their <br />assessment amount is changed by the Council they will be sent a letter documenting the change. <br /> <br />Assistant City Engineer Anderson commented that as provided for in State Statute, no appeal <br />may be taken as to the amount of any assessment adopted unless a written objection signed by the <br />affected property owner is filed with the City at or prior to the assessment hearing. After the <br />adoption of the assessment roll, property owners who have submitted an objection in writing have <br />30 days to serve notice of an appeal to the City, and within 10 days after serving notice to file with <br />the District Court. <br /> <br />Assistant City Engineer Anderson recommended that the Council hold the assessment hearing <br />first. Staff is prepared to make a presentation with a full discussion of the unique parcels <br />discussed previously in this memo. After the assessment hearing is closed, Council should <br />consider adopting Resolution 2015-028 Adopting the Assessment Roll for the 2015 Pavement <br />Management Program-Venus/Crystal Neighborhood with any changes they deem appropriate. <br />Following the May 4th assessment hearing for the Grant/Noble/Lake Lane portion of the project, <br />staff will be recommending award of the contract to Valley Paving as the lowest responsible <br />bidder. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant questioned how the 2004 assessment policy states future assessments shall occur <br />after 10 years. <br /> <br />Assistant City Engineer Anderson reported that the 2004 policy recommends that a 10-year <br />period be selected for reconstruction projects. He did not believe that the 2004 policy exempted a <br />homeowner from paying another assessment after 10 years. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked the life expectancy of a residential roadway. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.