Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form <br />May 2011 4 <br />11. Housing: If the proposed amendment changes the amount of land city-wide staged for <br />development for the 2011-2020 timeframe for medium density, high density, or mixed use residential <br />development, complete the following table to identify the amount of land available pre- and post- <br />amendment. <br /> <br />Fill in all land use categories <br />that allow multi-family <br />residential development <br />Acres city-wide for each land use <br />category <br />Pre-CPA <br />Acres city-wide for each <br />land use category <br />Post-CPA <br />Total Acres <br />Developed <br />Acres <br />Developable <br />Acres* <br />Amendment <br />Acres** <br />Developable <br />Acres <br />A B A – B = C D C + D = E <br />See Attachment B See Attachment <br />B <br />See Attachment <br />B <br />See Attachment <br />B <br />See Attachment <br />B See Attachment B <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />* Developable means land planned for urban residential development, infill, or redevelopment for the 2011-2020 timeframe. <br />** Amendment acres from the municipality’s response to Question #10 above. <br />12. Mississippi River Critical Area / MNRRA: Does the proposed amendment include any land within <br />the designated Mississippi National River and Recreation Area (MNRRA) and Critical Area boundaries? <br /> <br /> No. Not a community with CA / MNRRA boundaries or project site is not within CA / MNRRA <br />boundaries. <br /> Yes. Describe below how Critical Area guidelines and MNRRA Comprehensive Management Plan <br />policies are being addressed with this amendment. <br /> <br />SECTION 4: TRANSPORTATION http://www.metrocouncil.org/planning/LPH/LPHSect4.pdf <br /> <br />13. Trip Generation: Complete the table below using the most recent edition of the Institute of <br />Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual to show whether this plan amendment increases or <br />decreases trip generation compared to the planned land use and transportation element of the <br />community’s comprehensive plan. <br /> <br /> <br />Trip Generation for the Site <br />Based on Planned Land Use <br />Pre-Amendment <br />Trip Generation for the Site <br />Based on Planned Land Use <br />Post-Amendment <br />Estimated average daily traffic 41,545 51,150 <br />Estimated peak hour traffic 4,340 5,305 <br /> <br />14. Will these changes require improvements to the existing local and regional road network <br />or to interchanges beyond what is in the community’s current transportation plan? <br /> <br /> No, existing local and regional road networks can accommodate increase. <br /> Yes, improvements are needed. Describe improvements and who will pay for them below: <br />According to the AUAR, the following improvements are necessary to accommodate the development: TH 96 westbound <br />auxiliary lane from east of the project boundary to TH 10. Re-introduction of CR H southbound loop access to I-35W <br />(removed as part of the baseline scenarios), which remains barrier separated from I-35W southbound exit ramp to TH 10 <br />southbound, and enters I- 35W after joining the TH 10 southbound access ramp to I-35W southbound. The County is in the <br />process of redesigning the I-35W/CR 96 interchange. The new interchange will be designed to accommodate anticipated <br />future traffic, including the TCAAP development. At the intersection of Round Lake Road W at CR 96, the lane use of the