Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – May 7, 2014 7 <br /> <br />2. A PUD Amendment drafted by the City Attorney shall be executed prior to the issuance of a <br />building permit. <br />3. The Master PUD Amendment and Site Plan Review shall automatically expire and become <br />void one (1) year after the date on which the Council granted such approval if work on the <br />project has not begun. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this <br />matter: <br /> <br />1. Recommend Approval with Conditions <br />2. Recommend Approval as Submitted. <br />3. Recommend Denial <br />4. Table <br /> <br />Vice Chair Thompson opened the floor to Commissioner comments. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Thompson opened the public hearing at 6:57 p.m. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Thompson invited anyone for or against the application to come forward and make <br />comment. <br /> <br />There being no additional comment Vice Chair Thompson closed the public hearing at 6:58 <br />p.m. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Thompson asked if the proof of parking would be sufficient to meet the needs of the <br />site. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler explained that Boston Scientific has not had any issues with parking <br />on the campus, and had reserved areas that could be developed into additional parking if there <br />was an increase in demand. He indicated that staff was recommending that the proof of parking <br />be accepted in lieu of additional parking stalls. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Thompson questioned if there were noise concerns that should be considered with <br />the proposed addition. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler stated this was discussed with Boston Scientific. He reported that <br />one small additional rooftop unit would be added to Building 10. He did not anticipate that this <br />unit would impact the surrounding properties as it was a substantial distance from neighboring <br />properties. <br /> <br />Commissioner Holewa moved and Commissioner Hames seconded a motion to recommend <br />approval of Planning Case 14-015 for a Planned Unit Development Amendment and Site <br />Plan Review at 4100 Hamline Avenue North based on the findings of fact and the <br />submitted plans, as amended by the three (3) conditions in the May 7, 2014, report to the <br />Planning Commission. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS <br />