My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-26-15-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
05-26-15-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2015 2:13:04 PM
Creation date
6/30/2015 2:10:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—MAY 26, 2015 7 <br /> Michael Cronin, representative of Holiday Stationstore, reported that the timer was a clock that <br /> calculated the sunrise and sunset on a daily basis. The timer would then automatically throw the <br /> switch on a daily basis to a prescribed nighttime level. He provided the Council with a visual of <br /> the switch. He noted that Holiday currently uses these timers on each of its pricing signs. <br /> Councilmember Holmes questioned why Mr. Cronin referred to the City of Bloomington's Sign <br /> Code. <br /> Mr. Cronin noted that he was a resident of Bloomington and believed that Bloomington had a <br /> forward-thinking Sign Code. It was his opinion that the proposed nit levels within the code were <br /> reasonable and he commented that the dimmer would assist in addressing the concerns from <br /> adjacent residents. <br /> MOTION: Councilmember McClung moved and Councilmember Woodburn seconded a <br /> motion to deny Planning Case 15-008 for a PUD Amendment at 1920 West <br /> Highway 96, based on the submitted plans and the 18 Findings of Fact from <br /> the May 6, 2015 Staff Report to the Planning Commission. <br /> Mayor Grant believed that the Planning Commission's recommendation did not ring true, that <br /> the proposed tubing around the blue lighting would assist in diffusing the light. He was in favor <br /> of the motion to deny on the grounds that the nuisance and visual effect from the blue LED <br /> lighting was beyond what the City should entertain. <br /> Councilmember Woodburn stated that the Holiday Stationstore lighting was concealed from the <br /> adjacent neighborhoods during the summer months. However, the lighting would be very visible <br /> when the leaves were off all deciduous trees. He believed that glare was an issue and was <br /> subjective. He discussed how the eye views lighting logarithmically. He was disturbed by the <br /> similar lighting being used by Burger King and Menards. <br /> Mayor Grant commented that Holiday was using the blue lighting as a visual marker for passing <br /> traffic. He questioned if this long-distance visual impact should become a burden on Arden Hills' <br /> residents. He expressed concern with the sharp contrast the blue lighting had in the evening <br /> hours. <br /> Councilmember Holmes wanted to see the Council support its local businesses. She understood <br /> that LED lighting was a new technology and would be properly controlled through the proposed <br /> dimmer and timer. She believed that the Council would be doing a disservice to a local business <br /> by not allowing the additional lighting. <br /> Councilmember Holden indicated that the Planning Commission dismissed staff s <br /> recommendation and supported the additional lighting. She was in favor of the Council reviewing <br /> the City's Sign Code further to find out what lighting levels would be acceptable. <br /> Councilmember McClung commented that he was in Bloomington on Friday and Saturday <br /> night. He believed that the dimmed Holiday lights still stood out rather prominently. He feared <br /> how adjacent Arden Hills residents would be impacted if additional blue LED lighting were <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.