My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-26-08 EDC Meeting Minutes - Unsigned
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Economic Development Commission (EDC)
>
EDC Minutes
>
2008
>
02-26-08 EDC Meeting Minutes - Unsigned
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2015 2:44:10 PM
Creation date
7/30/2015 2:44:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EDC Minutes <br /> February 26, 2008 <br /> Page 2 of 10 <br /> Chair Kunkel said he thought the group needs to take some time and look this document over <br /> and provide comments to Asst. City Administrator Simon or City Planner Lehnhoff. City <br /> Planner Lehnhoff noted that comments can be taken for a couple weeks yet if there are none <br /> today. Asst. City Administrator Simon said the members could call or email either him or City <br /> Planner Lehnhoff with the comments. <br /> Councilmember Holden noted that she thought it was important the group look at the whole <br /> document as well because it all intermixes. She said there may be other issues that the group <br /> wants to provide input on. <br /> Nancy asked if this version of the Comp Plan different from the current one. City Planner <br /> Lehnhoff noted the current plan doesn't have an Economic Development/Redevelopment chapter <br /> so yes; it does differ quite a bit from the current plan. City Planner Lehnhoff noted the <br /> Economic Development/Redevelopment chapter is recommended but not required by law to be <br /> included. <br /> Rob asked if this plan includes affordable housing goals. City Planner Lehnhoff noted it does. <br /> He also indicated this plan requires Planning Commission approval and the final approval by the <br /> City Council. <br /> • Chair Kunkel asked about the length of the document in it's entirety as it stands now. City <br /> Planner Lehnhoff indicated it has 80 pages, not including maps. Chair Kunkel asked if the full <br /> document could be sent to the members via email. Asst. City Administrator Simon indicated it <br /> would be sent out via email. <br /> Jim Paulet noted the one thing that jumped out to him was the reduction of the amount of surface <br /> parking and inquired what the reasoning was behind this item. Asst. City Administrator Simon <br /> indicated the reasoning behind this item was looking at parking by identifying appropriate <br /> parking needs based on the use and averages and not an extreme on one end or the other. <br /> Rob said his thoughts are very consistent with what Asst. City Administrator Simon said — that <br /> there is no need to have 10 parking spaces when you only need 5 so it allows for an appropriate <br /> utilization of space. City Planner Lehnhoff said this helps prevent over paving and landscaping <br /> as well. <br /> Nancy asked if that meant supporting public parking ramps. City Planner Lehnhoff indicated he <br /> would say that could be one potential tool that can be used, but it doesn't necessarily say it <br /> supports parking ramps. He feels it is looking at all future ways parking can be reduced. <br /> Asst. City Administrator Simon noted he looked at the issue of parking structures and whether or <br /> not they would be viable and that would depend on the use of a property and the surrounding <br /> areas. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.