Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Cordes <br /> April 19, 2001 <br /> Page 2 <br /> was used for the road easement on the west side of Nott's property. I am enclosing copies of both <br /> the description from Nott's Certificate of Title and a marked up description from the September <br /> 25 revisions. Though most of the discrepancies would certainly be overlooked if abstract <br /> property, that may not be the case with registered property. And, in two instances, the calls are <br /> actually different in the revisions from the certificate. I believe Nott's property should be <br /> described exactly as on its Certificate of Title. <br /> Last, the issue of consideration has not been finally resolved. Nott has concluded it will <br /> grant the easement without being paid market value for the property, but it would like to be <br /> reimbursed for its attorney's fees. Fees have beer. $1,800 to date. I would anticipate I will not <br /> spend much more time on this matter if this letter is accurate regarding the current status. <br /> We will await doing anything further until we hear from a representative of the city. <br /> Thank you. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Jon B. Albrightson <br /> JBA/yyw <br /> Enclosures <br /> cc: R.A. Rosa <br /> Thomas J. Moore <br /> Jerry Filla <br />