My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 05-29-2001
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CCP 05-29-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2015 4:20:51 PM
Creation date
8/13/2015 3:18:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
189
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�� 4F <br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL— APRIL 30, 2001 t 9 <br /> Mayor Probst stated that to his knowledge the city has never had buoys on the lake even though <br /> the ordinance requires them. He noted he is not interested in doing this. He added he thinks the <br /> aesthetic of the lake is improved, but safety is not enhanced. He stated he does not want the city <br /> to deal with this and is not in favor of going down this path. <br /> Mr. Lynch stated the Ramsey County Water Patrol has enforcement responsibility and it is not <br /> clear they have a responsibility for buoy placement. He noted the city would have to pay fee to <br /> put them in and pull them out. <br /> Mayor Probst stated that part of this ordinance sets the area for no wake zone, yet there are <br /> occasions when people get closer than 250 feet. <br /> Mr. Lynch states it is the same as enforcement anywhere in state, the act is already done and the <br /> police are trying to make a determination that a violation has occurred. <br /> Mr. Filla stated they have had three violations because it is so difficult to enforce. He noted it <br /> would be hard to determine the location of the buoy and the speed of the watercraft. <br /> Councilmember Rem stated it seems to make sense to do it since they do not stop striping lanes <br /> because of the difficulty in enforcement. She noted if people want to ignore them, at least they <br /> should establish where they are. She added they are also talking about this without talking about <br /> the costs. <br /> Councilmember Aplikowski stated the cost does not matter. She noted it is an ordinance and <br /> they either enforce it or take it off the books. <br /> Mayor Probst stated Lake Johanna has an unusual speed policy. He noted the moment they open <br /> any part of the ordinance they would lose all of it. He added that therefore the desire has been to <br /> leave the ordinance alone. <br /> Councilmember Larson stated that on one hand he could see it happen. He noted people are <br /> driving close to shore and eroding it. Yet, he added the difficulty is the uneven shoreline so it is <br /> hard to demarcate the 250 line. He stated the buoys just do not seem a very satisfactory way to <br /> do it. He noted he would like to see improvement of the signs. <br /> Councilmember Larson stated it does not say who is responsible. He stated the Lakeshore <br /> Association could also be responsible. He noted he does not know how other people on lake feel <br /> about it. He added there might be something the Lakeshore Association wants to do. He stated <br /> it could be left to individual property owners. He stated people are using swimming rafts to keep <br /> people from coming too close. <br /> Councilmember Rem asked about potential liability from a city ordinance they are not enforcing. <br /> Mr. Filla responded it is not a good idea to have a regulation that regulates speed and not enforce <br /> it. He stated the regulation sounds like it was adopted because of safety concerns. He noted a <br /> city council adopted this. He added he agrees with Councilmember Aplikowski in that if they do <br /> not want to enforce it they should get rid of it. He stated it might be more complicated than that. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.