Laserfiche WebLink
Due to the reactions per our current analysis <br /> being less than those originally designed for, <br /> inner anchors are considered to be adequate. <br /> Please note, this consideration is accurate <br /> providing foundations and anchor shafts were <br /> properly designed per the site specific soils. <br /> See comments . <br /> ad hpcL Actual vertical uplift load of 22.45 kips and an <br /> actual horizontal load of 24.32 Kips per our <br /> analysis. Per the original reactions furnished to <br /> Subterranean Engineering, Inca by Unarco-Rohn, the <br /> middle anchors were design for an uplift load of <br /> 22.40 kips and a horizontal load of 23.30 kips. <br /> Due to the lack of information regarding the <br /> existing anchor shaft, EEI cannot comment on nor <br /> account for the capacity of the existing anchor . <br /> shaft to develop reactions per our current <br /> analysis. <br /> As previously outlined, the reactions per our <br /> current analysis are slightly greater than those <br /> originally designed for. EEI cannot comment on <br /> nor account for the existing soils to develop <br /> these increased reactions . We suggest these reac- <br /> tions are forwarded to Subterranean Engineering, <br /> Inc. to review the middle anchor design to deter- <br /> mine if soils are adequate. Modifications may be <br /> required. <br /> out Vic_ Actual vertical uplift load of 69.75 Kips and an <br /> actual horizontal load of 64 .86 Kips per our <br /> analysis. Per the: original reactions furnished to <br /> Subterranean Engineering, Inc. by Unarco-Rohn, the <br /> outer anchors were design for an uplift load of <br /> 61. 50 kips and a horizontal road of 52.10 kips . <br /> Due to the lack of information regarding the <br /> existing anchor shaft , EEI cannot comment on nor <br /> account for the capacity of the existing anchor <br /> shaft to develop' reactions per our current <br /> analysis. <br /> As previously outlined, the reactions per our <br /> current analysis are greater than those originally <br /> -desighb-d for _EEI------annot -comment on nor account <br /> for the existing soils to develop these increased <br /> reactions . We suggest these reactions are for- <br /> 4 <br />