Laserfiche WebLink
L— MAY 14 <br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCI , 2001 DRAFT 3 <br /> March 26,2001, Closed Executive Session, April 2, 2001, Special Council <br /> Meeting,April 9, 2001, Regular Council Meeting, and April 16, 2001, Council <br /> Worksession Meeting minutes as corrected above and to defer approval of the <br /> March 26, 2001, Regular Council Meeting Minutes. The motion carried <br /> unanimously(5-0). <br /> CONSENT CALENDAR <br /> A. Claims and Payroll <br /> B. Lift Station#8, Gridor Construction, Pay Request <br /> C. Summer Hours of Operation <br /> Councilmember Grant asked for clarification if a public works employee responds to an incident <br /> on Friday afternoon if it would be considered overtime. Mr. Lynch responded it would be <br /> overtime. <br /> MOTION: Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Grant seconded a motion to <br /> approve the Consent Calendar and authorize execution of all necessary documents <br /> contained therein. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> PUBLIC COMMENTS <br /> Mayor Probst invited those present to come forward and address the Council on any items not <br /> already on the agenda. <br /> No public comments were made. <br /> UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS <br /> A. Planning Cases <br /> 1. Case#00-39, City of Arden Hills,Right-of-Way Ordinance(First Read) <br /> Ms. Chaput explained the North Suburban Communication Commission(NSCC) submitted a <br /> model right-of-way ordinance based on the League of Minnesota Cities' (League)model. She <br /> stated it has been circulated around the cities within their cable area. She noted the League <br /> indicates it is a fairly successful, uniform set of regulations to govern the right-of-way. She <br /> added the memorandum dated May 7, 2001 lists the comments from the City Engineer and <br /> Public Works Director. She requested further direction from the Council. <br /> Mayor Probst stated this is a basic issue and a path the city has to go down. He noted he did not <br /> want to break any new ground and end up with an ordinance that was unenforceable. He asked <br /> about the status of this ordinance with the other communities within the cable area. Ms. Chaput <br /> responded that all but three communities have adopted this ordinance. She stated Roseville has <br /> almost exactly the same ordinance as this sample. She noted it would be helpful if the entire <br />