My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 06-11-2001
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CCP 06-11-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2015 4:20:44 PM
Creation date
8/13/2015 4:05:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
148
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
v <br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL— MAY 29, 2001 ,E .. 6 <br /> and tabled the Phase 1I plan. He noted the applicant would like to add 38 parking spaces to allow <br /> for additional parking. <br /> Mayor Probst asked if this modification still keeps the landscape plan within the requirements. <br /> Mr. Charles Hadgader, HKS services, responded that he represents the applicant. He stated in <br /> Phase I they would still comply with the landscape PUD requirements. He noted the Phase II <br /> plan would put them slightly under the 35 percent landscape requirement. <br /> Councilmember Larson asked if Mr. Hadgader's company was the manager of the building. Mr. <br /> Hadgader responded his firm is a consulting firm retained by Manufacturers' Services, a tenant in <br /> the building. <br /> Ms. Kelly Ortley, of United Properties, stated her company is the property manager and that <br /> Manufacturers' Services is the single tenant and has the need for this expansion. She noted this <br /> tenant has a longer-term lease. She added this project is what is needed to accommodate their <br /> building growth. <br /> Councilmember Larson stated in the past there has been some sentiment to have Untied <br /> Properties come in and tell the Council how they are going to rethink the way the parking is set <br /> up. Ms. Orley responded the Council would see that plan next month. She stated she had visited <br /> the Planning Commission two months ago and that they were asked to rethink the screening. She <br /> noted they have done so and would return to the Planning Commission at its next meeting. <br /> MOTION: Councilmember Aplikowski moved and Councilmember Rem seconded a motion <br /> to approve Planning Case#01-12,PUD Amendment for Manufacturers' Services <br /> to expand the existing parking area of 408 spaces by 38 spaces in Phase I, subject <br /> to the seven stated conditions. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> 3. Case#01-11, City of Arden Hills, Zoning Ordinance Amendment (Lakeshore <br /> Setbacks) <br /> A. Ordinance#325 Adoption <br /> Mr. Lynch explained this is also an issue the Council has discussed previously. He stated there <br /> was a recent case before the city noting the Planning Commissions' recommendation to <br /> reconsider changing the Lakeshore Setbacks of the Zoning Ordinance. He noted at this time, <br /> staff has recommended consideration of making the setbacks consistent with the DNR <br /> requirements. He added this gives additional flexibility to the residents. He reviewed the <br /> classifications of the lakes and the changes. <br /> Mayor Probst asked if a public hearing was required. Mr. Lynch responded the public hearing <br /> was held at the Planning Commission's meeting. <br /> MOTION: Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Grant seconded a motion to <br /> approve the amendment of Section 6 (C ) #1 (d) the Zoning Ordinances as per <br /> Ordinance#325. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.