My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 06-25-2001
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CCP 06-25-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2015 7:46:45 AM
Creation date
8/13/2015 4:56:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION—JUNE 6, 2001 7 <br /> This Planning Commission will be heard at the Monday, June 25, 2001 regular meeting of the <br /> City Council. <br /> PLANNING CASE #01-12b —MANUFACTURERS' SERVICES 4300 W. ROUND LAKE <br /> ROAD, PUD AMENDMENT (PHASE II PARKING) <br /> Mr. Cronin explained the applicant was requesting to amend the Planned Unit Development for <br /> 4300 West Round Lake Road to expand the parking area by 27 parking spaces along the <br /> southwest side of the parcel (Phase II). <br /> Mr. Cronin presented the background information by explaining that both phases (I and II) of <br /> this Planning Case were originally reviewed at the May 2, 2001 Planning Commission meeting. <br /> The Planning Commission recommended approval of Phase I,with conditions, to the City <br /> Council,heard at their meeting on May 29, 2001. The proposed Phase II parking area expansion <br /> was tabled for additional information regarding screening of the loading area and the <br /> replacement of trees that would be removed as a result of the expansion. Also, another planning <br /> case,Planning Case#01-08, was proposing screening for this property(as well as the two <br /> neighboring properties) at the same time that this Case was heard and the Planning Commission <br /> wanted to have the opportunity to review both Cases at the same meeting. <br /> Mr. Cronin noted the applicant had submitted an additional drawing for further review, <br /> illustrating additional landscaping,retaining wall locations and a section of the parking lot <br /> expansion in Phase II. <br /> Mr. Cronin summarized the zoning review for the Planning Case and advised the Phase II <br /> parking lot expansion proposed an additional 27 parking spaces beyond the 38 spaces provided <br /> in Phase I and the 408 parking spaces that currently existed. <br /> Mr. Cronin stated The original PUD requested that this property have no more than 20%office <br /> when constructed but it was built with 31%office with parking to match a 20%office build out, <br /> driving the need for additional parking today. Although the office (31%)to warehouse (69%) <br /> ratio was not proposed to change for this site, Phase II proposed an additional thirty employees <br /> in the warehouse. The proposal met all of the dimensional requirements of the G-B District, as <br /> shown in Table 1,with the exception of landscape lot area. <br /> Mr. Cronin explained the property was built with 37% landscape area. The proposed Phase II <br /> expansion decreased the landscape lot area below the Ordinance requirement (35%)to 33%. <br /> However, as a trade off, staff proposed that 33% landscape lot area was acceptable due to the <br /> willingness of the applicant to increase the number of trees in locations that would help to better <br /> screen the loading dock area which had been an issue in the past. <br /> Mr. Cronin advised the City of Arden Hills received the complete application for this request on <br /> April 4, 2001. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by June 3, <br /> 2001 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60- <br /> day review period. Staff sent the applicant a letter extending the additional review period to <br /> IsAugust 1, 2001. The City may, with the petitioners' consent, extend the review period beyond <br /> the August 1, 2001 date. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.