Laserfiche WebLink
JUN. 6. 2001 3:4 2 P M EHLERS & ASSOCIATES NO. 4497 P. 9 <br /> 60)9)1 C <br /> 4.06 Any developer requesting a business subsidy should able to demonstrate past successful general <br /> development capability as well as specific capability in the type and size of development proposed. <br /> 4.07 The developer must retain ownership of the project at least long enough to complete it,to stabilize <br /> its occupancy, to establish the project management, and to initiate repayment of the business <br /> subsidy. <br /> 4.08. A recipient of a business subsidy must make a commitment to continue operations at the site where <br /> the subsidy is used for at least five years after the benefit date. <br /> 4.09 The level of TTF funding should be reduced to the lowest possible level and least amount of time by <br /> maximizing the use of private debt and equity financing first,and then using other funding sources <br /> or income producing vehicles that can be structured into the project financing, prior to using <br /> additional TIF funding. <br /> 5. TAX INCREMENT PROJECT EVALUATION CRITERIA <br /> 5.01 All business subsidy requests will be evaluated on the following criteria for comparison with other <br /> proposed business subsidy requests reviewed by the City, and for comparison with other subsidy <br /> standards(where appropriate).It is realized that changes in local markets,costs of construction,and <br /> interest rates may cause changes in the amounts of Tax Increment subsidies that a given project may <br /> require at any given time. <br /> 5.02 Some criteria, by their very nature, must remain subjective. However, wherever possible <br /> "benchmark" criteria have been established for review purposes. The fact that a given proposal <br /> meets one or more"benchmark"criteria does not mean that it is entitled to funding under this policy, <br /> but rather that the City is in a position to proceed with evaluations of(and comparisons between) <br /> various business subsidy requests, using uniform standards whenever possible. <br /> 5.03 Following are the evaluation criteria that will be used by the City <br /> A. All business subsidy requests should optimize the private development potential of a site. <br /> B. All business subsidy requests should obtain the highest possible private to public financial <br /> investment ratio.The Council establishes a benchmark ratio of 3 parts private to 1 part public <br /> funding for projects. Housing and retail/commercial projects shall be reviewed on an <br /> individual basis. <br /> C. All business subsidy requests should create the highest feasible number of jobs on the site. <br /> The Council establishes a benchmark of one newly created FTE job per $6,000 of public <br /> assistance or one retained FTE job per$3,000 of public assistance provided to projects and <br /> establishes a benchmark of one newly created FTE job per$10,000 of public assistance or one <br /> retained FTE job per$3,000 of public assistance provided to the Industrial Park Project Area. <br /> All jobs will be"Living wage jobs"as determined by the Department of Labor. <br /> D. All business subsidy requests should create the highest possible ratio of property taxes paid <br /> before and after redevelopment.Given the different assessment circumstances in the City,this <br /> ratio will vary widely.However,under normal circumstances,the Council will expect at least <br /> a 1:2 ratio of taxes paid before and after redevelopment. <br />