My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-10-15-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
08-10-15-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2015 11:22:15 AM
Creation date
8/14/2015 11:21:16 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JULY 13, 2015 5 <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes stated that the Council has been requesting meetings with the County <br />for the past year. It was her understanding that the County Board wanted their staff to work with <br />the City staff but never took the time to meet with the City Council. She commented that the <br />Council has heard from the County on several occasions regarding their density concerns. She <br />supported the density ranges within the TRC plan and recommended that the Council move <br />forward. <br /> <br />Councilmember Woodburn understood density was a problematic area. He supported the <br />density within the TRC and did not believe that a two week delay would resolve this situation <br />between the City and the County. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant agreed with Councilmember Holden and believed that the City has heeded all <br />suggestions from the County. He did not understand why the density number was such a hang up. <br />He stated that perhaps the elected officials should have held additional discussions over the past <br />year. He could not comprehend how an additional 300 units would create a “world class” <br />development. He explained that the TRC could be amended if a developer brought a development <br />plan before the JDA or City requesting density flexibility. <br /> <br />Further discussion ensued regarding the approval timeline and reconsideration of the TCAAP <br />rezoning, TRC and CPA. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden feared that if the TRC was opened for further consideration that this <br />could lead to great delays in approvals as it would open the document for full reconsideration by <br />the City Council. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes understood that the County did not currently support the City’s plans. <br />This would lead to reconsideration of the plans in two weeks. She did not believe that the City’s <br />stance on these matters would change in two weeks. She feared that the City and the County were <br />at an impasse. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden supported the County taking a formal vote on the matter. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant believed it would benefit the County to provide the Council with numbers and for <br />them to run through the math on the project with the City Council. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes wanted to understand who from the County Board did not support the <br />TRC and CPA and she wanted to understand the reasons why. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant stated that he and three Councilmembers want this agenda item to move forward <br />tonight and requested staff to make their presentation. <br /> <br />City Planner Streff stated that since April 2013, the City has been working on a Master Plan for <br />the 427-acre TCAAP parcel purchased by Ramsey County. The Master Plan is comprised of three <br />components: the Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) and Mitigation Plan, the TCAAP <br />Redevelopment Code (TRC), and the Regulating Plan. The AUAR was approved by the City <br />Council in the summer of 2014, and preliminary approval was given to the TRC and Regulating <br />Plan on May 26, 2015. Together, these documents represent the community’s long-term vision for
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.