08-31-15-R - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—AUGUST 31, 2015 9 C. Regulation of Cellular Antennas Associate Planner Bachler stated that staff recently provided the City Council with a memo written by the City Attorney, Joel Jamnik, addressing the regulation of cellular antennas in the Zoning Code. The memo was provided in response to questions received from Councilmember Woodburn regarding the classification of cellular antennas as an accessory use. The City Attorney has provided suggested revisions to the Zoning Code to help clarify this issue. Associate Planner Bachler explained that at the City Council work session on August 17, 2015, Councilmember Holmes requested that this item be discussed by the City Council at a future meeting. If the City Council believes additional clarification is needed in the Zoning Code, staff is requesting that this direction be provided. Staff will then work with the Planning Commission on drafting an Ordinance to make any necessary revisions. Councilmember Woodburn questioned how this item would proceed. Associate Planner Bachler reported that staff was seeking comments from the City Council on what areas of the Code were in need of revision. Staff would then discuss the matter with the Planning Commission and make necessary revisions to the Zoning Code. Councilmember Woodburn provided the Council and staff with a handout addressing his concerns. He then discussed the handout in detail and addressed his concerns with regard to the regulation of cellular antennas. He believed there were contradictions in the definitions and requested clarification from staff regarding his concerns. Councilmember Holmes discussed the difference between principal, accessory and secondary uses. Councilmember Holden asked if the proposed changes made by the City Attorney addressed Councilmember Woodburn's concerns. Councilmember Woodburn reported that there were still contradictory definitions within the Code that concerned him. Mayor Grant requested that the City Attorney provide a brief summary on his memo to the City Council. City Attorney Jamnik commented that the revisions the City made to its antenna regulations in 2009 are consistent with neighboring communities. He advised that the City would like to see antennas co-located on existing high structures, water towers and the like, and in order to facilitate this, antennas were allowed as accessory uses when attached to existing buildings. He explained that this was a rational and logical approach that was taken by many cities. However, he understood that the definition of accessory use may need to be revised within the code. He provided comment on the antenna array that was recently approved for Verizon Wireless at Bethel University's facility at 2 Pine Tree Drive.