Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – SEPTEMBER 28, 2015 8 <br /> <br />City Administrator Klaers explained that the Council last discussed the budget at a work session <br />on August 17th. He discussed how the City’s tax base would increase this year due to the Round <br />Lake taxing district coming back onto the tax rolls. As discussed by the Council in August, a 3% <br />increase in the tax levy was being proposed by staff. The balance of the PIR fund balance was <br />noted and staff provided comment on the larger expenditures planned for 2016. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant believed there was general agreement among the Council in August to direct staff <br />to look at the budget and bring back a 3% levy. However, staff has brought to the Council a <br />document with a 6.5% levy. <br /> <br />Director of Finance and Administrative Services Iverson reported that staff did prepare a 3% <br />levy as a starting point which includes the use of $280,000 in reserves. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes asked if the City staffing situation with retirements would provide <br />savings or would recruiting costs offset this. <br /> <br />Director of Finance and Administrative Services Iverson believed that the savings would be <br />minimal in 2015. However, the City might achieve some savings in 2016 depending upon the rate <br />at which the new employees are hired. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes did not understand why the City had a deficit of $200,000 within the <br />budget. <br /> <br />Director of Finance and Administrative Services Iverson reviewed the budget document with <br />the Council in further detail noting expenditures outweighed revenues by $200,000 at this time. It <br />was noted that the expenditures for 2016, included a $100,000 contribution to the PIR fund. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant reminded the Council that single line items could be addressed in the future and <br />that the Council was only being asked to approve the preliminary levy this evening. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden explained that she was unable to attend the August work session where <br />the budget was discussed. She believed that a 3% tax levy was low. She supported increasing the <br />tax levy until the budget can be reviewed further. She noted that when the budget is discussed in <br />December there should be a better understanding regarding the impact new staff will have on the <br />City. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung supported the tax levy remaining at 3%. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes indicated that she supported the 6.5% suggestion in staff’s memo. She <br />believed that the proposed budget was well-reasoned. She indicated that the City will have <br />increased costs for TCAAP and new staffing that would differ from 2015. She understood that <br />Arden Hills’ residents took advantage and enjoyed the City’s parks and for this reason, she did not <br />want to see cuts made in this area. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant inquired if staff had looked into PIR spending reductions. <br />