Laserfiche WebLink
According to state law, any changes in zoning must be presented at a Public <br />Hearing, and this was held before Council on January 10, 1976. The new Ord- <br />inance contained not only changes in zoning, but additional zoning categor- <br />ies and definitions which were apparently confusing. Supporters of the pro- <br />posed Ordinance felt it would provide "tighter" control over growth and dev- <br />elopment. Opponents disagreed, maintaining the residential character and <br />orderly growth patterns of the Village were better protected under the ex- <br />isting Ordinance. <br />Specifically, Arden III residents challenged the proposed zoning change of <br />Northwestern. The present zoning of that property is "Residential". The <br />proposed Ordinance and map placed Northwestern property into a new zoning <br />description, "P-1", described as "Public Facilities". P-1 was also proposed <br />for Bethel College, Presbyterian Homes, Baptist General Conference, Arden <br />Hills Public Library, Valentine Hills Elementary School, Lake Johanna Elem- <br />entary School, Mounds View High School, all Village -owned (municipal) prop- <br />erties and two churches. Under both the old and proposed ordinances, such <br />facilities require a Special Use Permit. (A Special Use Permit is issued <br />at the discretion of the Council, taking into account the advice and recom- <br />mendations of its advisors and the views of residents.) <br />Arden III spokesmen, gazing at all the new P -1's sprinkled on the proposed <br />Zoning Map, felt this new description allowed more and greater expansion <br />with fewer legal controls available to the Village. The residents and their <br />legal counsel made an impact, and at the next Council meeting, January 24, <br />Council voted to delete the P -10s, returning all so -designated areas to <br />their previous, _respec-tive categories. <br />Although the P-1 issue was dead, others were not..... Final adoption of the <br />Proposed Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map certainly wasn't rushing its <br />way to conclusion, nor was the issue of Northwestern's request for permission <br />to build its Fine Arts building. The next chapter took place at the February <br />14 Council Meeting. The mood of residents and Council alike was testy and <br />tired. There was standing room only as Council convened, and unfortunately, <br />tensions increased when Council proceeded to discuss items relevant to the <br />new Ordinance which were not the issues on the minds of the citizens present. <br />After waiting some three hours to make a statement, residents' reaction to <br />the evening reflected their aching heads. The statement they intended to <br />make was apparently a brief one, a reminder to Council of their opposition <br />to the expansion of Northwestern College, attached to a Petition bearing <br />over 160 signatures. Northwestern countered with its Petition - 206 signa- <br />tures in favor of the expansion. <br />At the following Council meeting, February 28, there was again a full house. <br />On this occasion the subject was discussed early in the meeting. A motion was <br />made to adopt the new Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map, and did not <br />pass. State law requires a 2/3 majority to pass resolutions pertaining to <br />zoning; the vote was 3 aye and 2 nay. Therefore Arden Hills is still oper- <br />ating under the "old" Ordinance and its addendums, and Northwestern College <br />does not have approval for construction of its Fine Arts Center. <br />