My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
August 1977
ArdenHills
>
Communications
>
Arden Hills Notes Newsletter
>
1966-1979 Town Crier
>
1977
>
August 1977
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2015 10:56:39 AM
Creation date
11/9/2015 10:01:54 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
that a democracy is very inefficient in many ways." And I guess he's right. The time <br />wasted is made up with the justice gained. It's much better to be slow and sure than I quick and sorry. <br />At the last Planning Commission and Council meetings, our now city planner Orly& <br />Miller has really come across as knowledgeable, fair, and practical. He reminded everyone <br />that the real reason for granting setback variances was for "hardship" rather than esthetic $ <br />and that "hardship" must relate to "the characteristics of the land." On the other hand, <br />he pointed out that "strict enforcement of ordinances encourages mediocrity." <br />This brought up the question then ofs Wby have ordinances if variances are routinely ' <br />granted? Apparently the problem goes back to the seller of a lot. He understandably <br />never points out to the buyer that although the lot may contain the minimum square footage <br />required by Arden Hills, the lot itself may be strangely shaped. There are lots that will <br />take only a certain style house, perhaps a style not desired by the lot purohaser. (For <br />instance there was the young couple that had a lot that would take only a long, narrow house. <br />They were already living in a mobile home.) So if you plan on building a new home in Arden <br />Hills, better make sure your dream house will fit on the lot you buy. 1-1 <br />Received some critical letters -to -the -editor this month (my husband refers to them ' <br />as my "fan mail") on the article suggesting that the school board members shouldn't all be <br />educators. The writers objected to the fact that I put forth my opinions on this matter <br />in the Town Crier rather than writing a letter to the New Brighton Bulletin. Both of the <br />angry letter writers are employed by School District 621 and both live on Indian Oaks Trail.' <br />Here are some exoerptss <br />"One of the efforts of a public school in a free society is to teach students the in- <br />equality of pro -judging a person because of his associations, his jobs, his religion, or <br />his ethnic background. Let each person 'prove' himself before the voters. I find your <br />bditorialt, if that is what is is, offensive to the democratic spirit in Arden Hills." <br />That one was from Bill Feyereisen. This next is,from Tim Glaros. , <br />"I was dismayed at the use of this otherwise very informative publication for your <br />personal f orwn. I don't believe the Town Crier is the appropriate place for your editorial <br />statements." , <br />'Nell. The original purpose of this newsletter was to get information to the residents <br />of the Village in a manner interesting enough that it would be read. It is very difficult <br />to be interesting and to ' please all of the people all of the time.' One of my very first ' <br />instructions was to criticize where I felt it was needed. The Tarn Crier is not here to <br />pat everyone, on the back or to be blindly supportive of every activity. I truly didatt <br />realize that this particular article would be offensive to anyone; in fact, it was sort of <br />a 'filler' item. And, although I editoralize in practically everything I write, this was <br />the only thing that stirred up anger. <br />I did receive one letter agreeing with my remarks from Mr. and Mrs. Clarence Peterson <br />on Edgewater. They saids "By the way I agree with your comments that we need sante people <br />with broad experience that are not educators, on the Mounds View School Board. �xve no <br />complaints about past school boards, but I think the majority on a school board should con- <br />sist of people not associated with education directly..... or with firms that sell products ' <br />to the educations marts^ t- Un the other hand, one or two members should be or have been <br />educators. I believe the net result would be that the views of residents would be given <br />more serious consideration..." , <br />The Petersons have a good point. Being or not being an educator is oertainly not the <br />�oon__l__y�� reason to vote or not vote for someone; however, it is important. Contrary to what Mr, <br />Fyereisen says, anytime a person mares a choice about anything (his associations,his jobs, <br />his religion), that person is making a eta-toment about himself and can be evaluated on that ' <br />basis. <br />In Roseville, my son's orthodontist has been elected to the school board. Judging his <br />on the basis of his job, he will no doubt get everything straightened out. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.