Laserfiche WebLink
Published by the Arden Hills Newsletter <br />Publication Committee <br />No. 132 December 1979 <br />T ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING ON DECEMBER 13 <br />The Arden Hills City Council will hold a <br />O <br />Public Hearing on the proposed new zoning ordin- <br />ance on Thursday, December 13, at 8:00 PM in <br />1Wthe Village Hall. This ordinance affects each <br />resident of AH, often very directly, and every - <br />Cone is encouraged to attend this hearing. <br />NSo far, just one resident of AH has been <br />R interested enough about this ordinance to write <br />to the Council and express his concerns. His <br />= feeling is that the one time when a citizen is <br />sure to have direct contact with the Planning <br />Fa Commission and Council is when that citizen <br />applies for a Building Permit for a project for <br />his/her home (a fence, garage, room addition, <br />• • • etc.) And, very often, this citizen will dis- <br />cover that in order to complete the projectthe <br />way he wants to, a Variance is required. (Most <br />generally, a Variance is required because the <br />new room or garage will be closer to the property <br />line than allowed by ordinance.) Since a person's <br />home is usually his biggest financial investment, this Variance request becomes <br />quite important. <br />The letter -writer thinks that the system for asking for a Variance should <br />be laid out more clearly and that getting the Variance should be made easier. <br />He argues that "the people requesting variances are our neighbors..." and that <br />"if the neighbors don't object, and there is no detrimental community impact, <br />and the variance does not alter the essential character of the neighborhood..." <br />then it should be granted. He concludes by suggesting that the Planning Com- <br />mission and Council "approach each variance as a personal problem, not an ab- <br />stract principle, recognizing its individual character. Avoid categorical <br />rigidity." <br />Currently, the only time a Variance is granted is if "practical diffi- <br />culties or unnecessary hardships" would be imposed upon the applicant by not <br />granting it. The financial cost of any project has never been considered to <br />be a "practical difficulty", even though it sometimes might cost more to build <br />according to ordinance than it would with a Variance. <br />At any rate, the new ordinance concerning variances plus a myriad of other <br />items will be up for public discussion on the 13th. Copies of the ordinance <br />may be borrowed from the Village Hall if you want to see exactly what will be <br />voted upon. <br />EDITOR'S COMMENT: I must agree with our concerned letter -writer that the rules <br />for applying for a Building Permit and/or Variance should be set out simply <br />and clearly. To the personnel at the Village Hall, the Planning Commission, <br />and the Council, the procedure is routine. But for someone asking for a Var- <br />iance for the first time, it can be an intimidating and frustrating experience. <br />On the other hand, I don't think a Variance should be granted just because <br />somebody asks for one. Perhaps a clear understanding of why the rules were <br />(' set would help; for instance, why must a residential house have a 40' setback <br />from the road? <br />Come to the Hearing on Dec. 13, and find the answers. <br />I I <br />