My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-05-08-PC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2004-2009
>
PC Packets 2008
>
11-05-08-PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2024 12:06:56 AM
Creation date
11/12/2015 3:27:35 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Savingsome bark but with les's bi"te <br /> elindw of the burden to property owners,Minnetonka has softened language in a proposed ordinance to protect its oldest trees. <br /> By LAURIEBLAKE •iblake@star ibme.com Aug.ll that is kinder to property owners. U <br /> The council's caution on the tree ordinance is <br /> PERCENT WITH <br /> It's tree protection.versus property rights in tied to residents'resounding rejection of the city's <br /> Minnetonka proposed shoreline ordinance late last year.In that <br /> Bowing to landowners who say-saving trees case,the city wanted to protect water quality by re- <br /> would reduce the number of lots they could sell OFSAVINGTREES <br /> quiring lake-and creek-front homeowners to line s <br /> for new homes,the City Council has backed away their shorelines with native plants when they re- <br /> BUTIFEELIAM- <br /> from a strict tree preservation ordinance designed modeled or rebuilt waterfront homes.Residents <br /> to save 75 percent of the old,quality trees in new turned out by the hundreds to oppose that pro LOSINGSOME <br /> - <br /> subdivisions. posaL J . <br /> Unwilling to approve the ordinance at its July <br /> 14 meeting—after two years of studying the issue Minnetonka continues-.Developer's dearcutting George MacGibbon,a landowner' <br /> —council members willconsider new wording on- prompted a call for protecting trees.86► affected by the tree ordinance plan <br /> . City staff members proposed 171e Council Member Tony Wag- <br /> C7 ty alms an ordinance focused specifi- ner has said that he is still look <br /> 1 cally on subdivisions because Cie LeFevere, who re- <br /> cently won city approval fora �for an ordinance that would <br /> forbalance °fin-lot developmentisthreat- prevent a case like Crosby <br /> erring what remains ofthe shady 4.2-acre,five-lot subdivi- Y <br /> I sign called Coyote Song, told Cove from happening again, <br /> canopy provided by the city's the council that`the number of because citizens are asking the <br /> with tre e °�merest,said Natural Re- lots in a subdivision is of critical city to preserve the feeling of <br /> source Director Jo Colleran their neighborhoods. <br /> The ordinance would. ap- importance to a landowner." <br /> George MacGibbon said his "When we see a subdivision <br /> OS ply to 1,250 acres of"woodland property on Timberline Road of land going in and the big old <br /> preservation areas"—parcels is entirely within the proposed oak trees are going down to ac- <br /> pfip. <br /> of land that are at least 2 acres tr preservation area"I agree commodate new housing,that <br /> in size and contain remnants of <br /> the city's earliest tree cover.Ile 100 percent with the philoso- is when we-hear from resi- <br /> . MINNETONKA FROM Bi ordinance also would apply to <br /> phy of saving trees,but I feel dents that our neighborhood The message was"we were healthy individual trees 15 inch- I am losing some control the is changing because you are al- <br /> reaching too far and asking too es or more in diameter,which way it is going.- lowing all these oak trees to be <br /> " would be defined as `hi In recognition of property removed,"Colleran said. <br /> much, said Council Member pn- owners'rights, the ordinance "Ibis ordinance is trying to <br /> Brad Wiersum. "I want to be lode Both categories could in- says developers who are will- strike a balance between al- <br /> sure that we don't make that dude oaks that are more than. ing lowing`development and pro- <br /> same mistake with the tree or- 200 years old,Colleran said .to work with the city and P <br /> Altho use creative design and con- tecting neighborhood charac- <br /> dinance.At the end of the day, �Minnetonka'sstar- struction methods to save ter,and it is a difficult thing to <br /> I believe in the sacredness of dard lot size is half an acre,the <br /> trees can work back to half- achieve:' <br /> property rights:' ordinance seeks to save trees by acre lots. <br /> requiring a 1=acre lot any time <br /> Origins of the ordinance that development threatens to This the provision that <br /> remove more than 25 percent City Council members have <br /> Work on the tree ordinance of a woodland rotection area asked the staff'to strengthen <br /> began in 2005, after council p in the revision to,be consid- <br /> members were shocked to find °rmO� trees. tofalot's <br /> the city_was powerless to stop a <br /> high priority trees. ered Aug.ll. <br /> developer from clearing some T71e'Idea is that a full acre <br /> rolling wooded property for the would provide enough space <br /> Crosby Cove development for trees and houses and roads. <br /> Council members asked the But that could reduce the <br /> developer to use creative de- number of lots a landowner <br /> sign and construction to save could sell <br /> trees, "and he adamantly re- <br /> fused,even to the point of get- <br /> his lawyer involved say- <br /> i 'u can't make me do it," <br /> W ty Attorney Desyl Peter-' <br /> son said. <br /> After that,council members <br /> asked for more tools to protect <br /> trees. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.