My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-30-15-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
11-30-15-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2015 8:03:28 AM
Creation date
11/30/2015 12:27:20 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
203
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – NOVEMBER 16, 2015 3 <br /> <br />Community Development Director Hutmacher indicated that Park A is a small park on the west <br />side of the spine road between the commercial and office area, and Park B is located by the water <br />treatment facility. It was noted the Town NH park is along the pedestrian corridor and the two <br />parks in the Hill area are combined in this table. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant asked how the cost per acre was calculated. <br /> <br />Stacie Kvilvang noted that while the improvement and financing costs listed in the table are <br />approximately $8 million, her initial estimate was closer to $9 million and that the City had settled <br />on $7 million. She said she is concerned $7 million may be too little if costs come in higher. The <br />table includes $7 million in park development costs and approximately $1.2 million in financing <br />costs. <br /> <br />Stacie Kvilvang stated that to determine the per acre cost, she took the total land value of <br />approximately $66 million and broke it out based on residential, office, retail, and commercial. She <br />used the initial model from Ramsey County as far as what they were anticipating for land sale <br />proceeds and the fair market value. The land dedication percentage would be based on an actual <br />sale price. <br /> <br />Stacie Kvilvang discussed the three fee structure scenarios: <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />In Scenario 1, commercial and residential pay a park development fee but there is no land <br />dedication fee. To reach the total needed for improvement and financing costs of $8.2 million, the <br />residential park development fee would have to be approximately $4,300 per unit. This scenario <br />does not work well as this formula nets 32 dedicated acres while the City has planned for 24 <br />dedicated acres. In addition, it puts the burden on residential units to pay significantly more. <br />Because the ordinance gives the City discretion on whether to accept cash or land, the City is able <br />to avoid Scenario 1. <br /> <br />In Scenario 2, the County or developer dedicates residential land and commercial pays a total land <br />dedication fee of 10% of the land value. In this example, the residential park development fee is <br />reduced to $2,900. She said this figure is common in the metro area and meets the City’s goals. <br /> <br />In Scenario 3, the City receives no dedicated land from the County or developer and so the City <br />must purchase the land. The City would charge a land dedication fee for both residential and <br />commercial and there also would be a park improvement fee. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant asked what figures were used.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.