My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-19-15-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
10-19-15-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/8/2024 12:05:28 AM
Creation date
12/3/2015 9:03:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—OCTOBER 19, 2015 2 <br /> Associate Planner Bachler asked for further direction from the City Council on whether these <br /> changes should be pursued. <br /> Councilmember McClung directed Councilmembers and City staff to the Land Use Chart in the <br /> Zoning Code. He asked if this change pertains to the specific Zoning Districts where retail sales <br /> and services uses are currently either permitted, accessory or conditional. <br /> Councilmembers McClung, Holmes and Holden outlined the areas in the city where retail uses <br /> are currently allowed as follows: along and behind Lexington Avenue on streets that include Red <br /> Fox Road, Grey Fox Road, County Road E, County Road B2, as well as the Neighborhood <br /> Business area and TCAAP site. <br /> Associate Planner Bachler confirmed that the City is not looking to expand the area and stated <br /> retail as a principal use is allowed only in the main commercial districts designated as follows: B- <br /> 2, B-3, and B-4, and Neighborhood Business. He said retail as an accessory use is allowed in the <br /> industrial areas of I-Flex, I-1, and I-2. He stated if the Council wants to move forward with <br /> creating a separate definition for resale businesses, they should consider in which zoning districts <br /> that use would be appropriate. He also stated that the Council should consider if some districts <br /> should allow both new and used retail businesses. He said this issue could be brought to the <br /> Planning Commission for input regarding which zoning districts this would be appropriate. <br /> Councilmember Holmes stated the Planning Commission feels there is a need in the city for <br /> second hand stores partly due to popularity with the youth, but that they did not really think about <br /> where those stores should be located. She said the Council is concerned more with where these <br /> stores are located and that some cities have row after row of second-hand stores. <br /> Councilmember Holmes believes there should be a second definition and that there should never <br /> be a place where retail sales are not allowed. She feels retail sales should remain as they are and <br /> that the Council should focus on where resale goods would be allowed by either conditional use or <br /> permitted use. <br /> Mayor Grant arrived at the meeting at 5:11 pm. <br /> Discussion ensued regarding retail versus resale businesses and the zoning districts. <br /> Councilmember Holmes outlined her recommendation for resale businesses in the various <br /> zoning districts as follows: <br /> • N-B—Conditional <br /> • B-1 —Conditional <br /> • B-2—Conditional <br /> • B-3 —Conditional <br /> • B-4—Permitted <br /> • Do not touch MB <br /> Associate Planner Bachler clarified that zoning districts MR and MB were created for the <br /> TCAAP site. He said that once the City receives approval from the Met Council on the TCAAP <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.