My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2A, Memo and Minutes
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
04-12-11-J-FPAC
>
2A, Memo and Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/23/2024 12:05:48 AM
Creation date
2/29/2016 10:29:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Struck Items per 3/29/2010 Meeting <br /> Recommendation for Creating a TIF Evaluation Process <br /> Develop TIF Spending Guidelines <br /> In order to better manage TIF financing decisions over the long term we recommend the City <br /> debate and set into policy a limit-guideline on the total projected tax capacity of all tax <br /> increments in the City. Without a specific need we believe the City should limit the total <br /> projected tax capacity of all tax increments to not exceed 3/4 of the state average of 6.4%. This <br /> Iwould mean a 4n uideline for projected tax capacity for all tax increments in the City not to <br /> exceed 5%. <br /> TIF 1' 't split between f T A A D and the Fest .file om,_ rlise the TIF t <br /> •' <br /> 0 whieh would be 13,%. <br /> At the same!ime we fecommend b the Fest of the City to half the st.-ate . <br /> Therefore. i di T(`A A F we feeommend the following 1;.+.;+�• <br /> TC A A n i not <br /> Rest of the City 30,'o <br /> T 13,0 <br /> We also recommend that any proposed change of this allocation be done by a 5/7 vote of the full <br /> • City Council. <br /> Develop measurement criteria <br /> We recommend that the city debate and approve a set of long-term criteria with which to weigh <br /> potential TIF projects. <br /> The City has already developed a vision statement. The Committee considered whether this <br /> might be adequate as long term measurement criteria. One could simply compare a development <br /> project to the City's stated long-term strategic goals. While the process would be a good first <br /> step, we feel that it is too broadly worded to be used as criteria and would lead to confusion from <br /> both developers trying to assess how the city will view their individual projects and citizens who <br /> wonder why a particular project is or is not approved. We recommend the city develop a set of <br /> more refined, long-term selection criteria with which to weigh development projects seeking <br /> TIF. <br /> We further recommend that developing these criteria be done outside the process of considering <br /> any individual project. This will help ensure, as best as possible, an independent view of the <br /> long-term needs and strategy of the City. These long-term criteria would then be integrated into <br /> the current process of evaluating business subsidies. <br /> Assign points <br /> We recommend using a point based assessment system. There are multiple ways to implement <br /> this, but the goal of any method should be that when a project is assessed it would be granted <br /> points relative to how much it met each criterion and how relatively important that criterion is. <br /> Page 3 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.