My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-11-16-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
04-11-16-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2016 2:40:03 PM
Creation date
4/8/2016 2:39:11 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – MARCH 21, 2016 6 <br /> <br />Mayor Grant provided background regarding the I-694/TH 51 project and said the project did <br />not include a pedestrian crossing. He stated that Arden Hills appealed the design and that as part <br />of the process and negotiations, a trail was requested and subsequently created on Lexington <br />Avenue over I-694. He also stated that the County Road E bridge reconstruction pedestrian <br />walkway was part of the negotiations as were improvements to the County Road F bridge. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant said that while Arden Hills requested this study, it appeared the scope had changed <br />greatly. He stated that I-694 is a major barrier because it is a major road and does not offer options <br />for pedestrian crossings. He asked how the City could make trail connections over I-694 happen <br />and appreciated the fact that MnDOT did not have the funding or jurisdiction over such projects. <br /> <br />Sheila Kauppi of MnDOT stated this study was the first of its kind and noted that MnDOT has <br />limitations as to how they could spend their funding. She stated trunk highway dollars were <br />assigned to MnDOT owned right-of-way and so it is difficult to build a trail over a county road or <br />city street. She said that a benefit of the study was that it could aid in the City’s solicitation of <br />funding for improvements along the corridor. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden stated the original focus was to provide opportunities for residents of <br />Arden Hills to cross over I-694. <br /> <br />Gina Mitteco stated that MnDOT has a complete streets policy that considers pedestrians and <br />bicyclists but this does not mean that every project gets a trail. She indicated that given the <br />barriers along the I-694 corridor, locations that provide safe crossings with less extensive <br />infrastructure changes were ideal. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes referred to the municipal consent agreement and noted a pedestrian <br />crossing at Snelling Avenue and I-694 was not an expectation. She remembers a compromise that <br />included a crossing at Lexington Avenue. <br /> <br />Gina Mitteco stated that MnDOT has interstates all over the region and there are trail gaps <br />everywhere. She suggested Cities and Counties initiate funding via grants to aid in financing <br />construction of pedestrian walkways. <br /> <br />Acting Public Works Director Anderson stated that when the City applies for funding for trails, <br />the City is scored and receives points based on whether or not the improvements are written into a <br />long term plan and whether or not we are in agreement with other communities. He said that this <br />study furthers the City’s chance of receiving federal funding. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant said that the Council could review the language in the original agreement and <br />asked if any action was expected from the Council at that time. <br /> <br />Acting Public Works Director Anderson stated he was simply providing the final study and if <br />no action was identified or required by MnDOT, they would conclude the study. <br /> <br />D. 2016 PTRC Work Plan and Project Priorities Discussion <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.