My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-18-16-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
04-18-16-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/18/2016 8:26:36 AM
Creation date
4/18/2016 8:25:01 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />2 <br /> <br />positions. We had hoped to work together toward reform, and we hope to work together in the <br />future if the position of the organization changes. <br /> <br />However, in the meantime we are aware that many cities hold positions on Metropolitan <br />Council reform that also contradict the official Metro Cities position, and we believe that these <br />cities, along with counties, should have their voices heard in the Legislature. <br /> <br />4) What are the next steps? <br /> <br />These draft principles have been distributed to every city and county in the metropolitan area, <br />and we hope as many as possible adopt these principles. We are eager to discuss the principles, <br />along with our reasons for advocating reform, with any County Board or City Council in the area. <br /> <br />During the Legislative Session we will present these adopted resolutions to Legislators to <br />illustrate how important reform is to local governments in the metro area, and we will work <br />with Legislators to advance reform proposals that meet the adopted principles. <br /> <br />5) How do other metropolitan areas provide regional planning? <br /> <br />Every other major metropolitan area in the United States, as well as every other metropolitan <br />area in Minnesota, has a metropolitan planning organization that is made up of a majority of <br />local elected officials (Attachment B). <br /> <br />The Metropolitan Council does have a more expansive role than planning organizations in other <br />metropolitan areas, and is involved in a wider array of metropolitan service operations. <br />However, we believe this is an even stronger reason why elected officials should serve. The <br />Council has more responsibility than other metropolitan planning organizations- it stands to <br />reason that it should have more accountability to the electorate, not less. <br /> <br />6) Is this an effort to get rid of the Metropolitan Council? <br /> <br />Absolutely not. Regional governance is important, but it would be more effective and credible <br />with local representation. In the current system, Metropolitan Council members are non- <br />elected individuals answerable only to the Governor, an office that has often been elected <br />without majority support from metropolitan-area voters. We believe that only elected officials <br />who are directly accountable to the electorate should hold the responsibility to impose taxes. <br />The Council has a budget of over $1.5 billion in 2016 (more than that of the City of Minneapolis) <br />and the authority to levy taxes on metropolitan-area residents ($82 million in 2016). We believe <br />that the Council should be answerable to the citizens and taxpayers of the area it represents <br />rather than a single officeholder and should feature strong representation from local elected <br />officials. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.